Title of article
Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention volume and patient mortality, 1998 to 2000: Does the evidence support current procedure volume minimums? Original Research Article
Author/Authors
Andrew J. Epstein، نويسنده , , Saif S. Rathore، نويسنده , , Kevin G. M. Volpp، نويسنده , , Harlan M. Krumholz، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
8
From page
1755
To page
1762
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) hospital percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume minimum recommendations.
Background
In order to reduce procedure-associated mortality, ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that hospitals offering PCIs perform at least 400 PCIs annually. It is unclear whether this volume standard applies to current practice.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Qualityʹs Nationwide In-patient Sample hospital discharge database to evaluate in-hospital mortality among patients (n = 362,748) who underwent PCI between 1998 and 2000 at low (5 to 199 cases/year), medium (200 to 399 cases/year), high (400 to 999 cases/year), and very high (1,000 cases or more/year) PCI volume hospitals.
Results
Crude in-hospital mortality rates were 2.56% in low-volume hospitals, 1.83% in medium-volume hospitals, 1.64% in high-volume hospitals, and 1.36% in very high-volume hospitals (p < 0.001 for trend). Compared with patients treated in high-volume hospitals (odds ratio [OR] 1.00, referent), patients treated in low-volume hospitals remained at increased risk for mortality after adjustment for patient characteristics (OR 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.28). However, patients treated in medium-volume hospitals (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14) and patients treated in very high-volume hospitals (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03) had a comparable risk of mortality. Findings were similar when high- and very high-volume hospitals were pooled together.
Conclusions
We found no evidence of higher in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing PCI at medium-volume hospitals compared with patients treated at hospitals with annual PCI volumes of 400 cases of more, suggesting current ACC/AHA PCI hospital volume minimums may merit reevaluation.
Keywords
odds ratio , myocardial infarction , PCI , Confidence interval , NIS , SMR , MI , OR , Percutaneous coronary intervention , CI , ACC/AHA , ICD-9-CM , American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association , AHRQ , Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision-Clinical Modification , Nationwide In-patient Sample , standard mortality ratio
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
459092
Link To Document