Title of article :
Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention volume and patient mortality, 1998 to 2000: Does the evidence support current procedure volume minimums? Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Andrew J. Epstein، نويسنده , , Saif S. Rathore، نويسنده , , Kevin G. M. Volpp، نويسنده , , Harlan M. Krumholz، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages :
8
From page :
1755
To page :
1762
Abstract :
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) hospital percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume minimum recommendations. Background In order to reduce procedure-associated mortality, ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that hospitals offering PCIs perform at least 400 PCIs annually. It is unclear whether this volume standard applies to current practice. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Qualityʹs Nationwide In-patient Sample hospital discharge database to evaluate in-hospital mortality among patients (n = 362,748) who underwent PCI between 1998 and 2000 at low (5 to 199 cases/year), medium (200 to 399 cases/year), high (400 to 999 cases/year), and very high (1,000 cases or more/year) PCI volume hospitals. Results Crude in-hospital mortality rates were 2.56% in low-volume hospitals, 1.83% in medium-volume hospitals, 1.64% in high-volume hospitals, and 1.36% in very high-volume hospitals (p < 0.001 for trend). Compared with patients treated in high-volume hospitals (odds ratio [OR] 1.00, referent), patients treated in low-volume hospitals remained at increased risk for mortality after adjustment for patient characteristics (OR 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.28). However, patients treated in medium-volume hospitals (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14) and patients treated in very high-volume hospitals (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03) had a comparable risk of mortality. Findings were similar when high- and very high-volume hospitals were pooled together. Conclusions We found no evidence of higher in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing PCI at medium-volume hospitals compared with patients treated at hospitals with annual PCI volumes of 400 cases of more, suggesting current ACC/AHA PCI hospital volume minimums may merit reevaluation.
Keywords :
odds ratio , myocardial infarction , PCI , Confidence interval , NIS , SMR , MI , OR , Percutaneous coronary intervention , CI , ACC/AHA , ICD-9-CM , American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association , AHRQ , Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision-Clinical Modification , Nationwide In-patient Sample , standard mortality ratio
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2004
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
459092
Link To Document :
بازگشت