Title of article :
A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Andrew G.C. Sutton، نويسنده , , Philip G. Campbell، نويسنده , , Richard Graham، نويسنده , , Dallas J.A. Price، نويسنده , , Janine C. Gray، نويسنده , , Ever D. Grech، نويسنده , , James A. Hall، نويسنده , , Alun A. Harcombe، نويسنده , , Robert A. Wright، نويسنده , , Roger H. Smith، نويسنده , , Jerry J. Murphy، نويسنده , , Ananthaiah Shyam-Sundar، نويسنده , , Michael J. Stewart، نويسنده , , Adrian Davies، نويسنده , , Nicholas J. Linker، نويسنده , , Mark A. de Belder، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages :
10
From page :
287
To page :
296
Abstract :
Objectives We sought to compare emergency coronary angiography with or without rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with conservative treatment in patients with failed fibrinolysis complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Background Most patients with STEMI receive fibrinolytic therapy and aspirin. The management of failed fibrinolysis is unclear. Methods A total of 307 patients with STEMI and failed fibrinolysis were randomized to emergency coronary angiography with or without rescue PCI or conservative treatment. Results Thirty-day all-cause mortality was similar in the rescue and conservative groups (9.8% vs. 11%, p = 0.7, risk difference [RD] 1.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −5.8 to 8.3). The composite secondary end point of death/re-infarction/stroke/subsequent revascularization/heart failure occurred less frequently in the rescue group (37.3% vs. 50%, p = 0.02, RD 12.7%, 95% CI 1.6 to 23.5), driven by less subsequent revascularization (6.5% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.01, RD 13.6%, 95% CI 6.2 to 21.4). Re-infarction and clinical heart failure were less common in the rescue group (7.2% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.3, RD 3.2%, 95% CI −3.3 to 9.9; and 24.2% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.3, RD 5.7%, 95% CI −4.3 to 15.6, respectively). Strokes and transfusions were more common in the rescue group (4.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.03, RD 3.9%, 95% CI 0.5 to 8.6; and 11.1% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001, RD 9.8%, 95% CI 4.9 to 19.9, respectively). Left ventricular function at 30 days was the same in the two groups. Conclusions Rescue angioplasty did not improve survival by 30 days, but improved event-free survival, almost completely due to a reduction in subsequent revascularization. Rescue angioplasty was associated with more strokes and more transfusions and did not result in preservation of left ventricular systolic function at 30 days.
Keywords :
PCI , Left ventricular , CABG , Risk difference , Percutaneous coronary intervention , Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , merlin , LV , TIMI , Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction , STEMI , ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction , Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction trial , RD , RWMI , regional wall motion index
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2004
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
459269
Link To Document :
بازگشت