Title of article
A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial Original Research Article
Author/Authors
Andrew G.C. Sutton، نويسنده , , Philip G. Campbell، نويسنده , , Richard Graham، نويسنده , , Dallas J.A. Price، نويسنده , , Janine C. Gray، نويسنده , , Ever D. Grech، نويسنده , , James A. Hall، نويسنده , , Alun A. Harcombe، نويسنده , , Robert A. Wright، نويسنده , , Roger H. Smith، نويسنده , , Jerry J. Murphy، نويسنده , , Ananthaiah Shyam-Sundar، نويسنده , , Michael J. Stewart، نويسنده , , Adrian Davies، نويسنده , , Nicholas J. Linker، نويسنده , , Mark A. de Belder، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
10
From page
287
To page
296
Abstract
Objectives
We sought to compare emergency coronary angiography with or without rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with conservative treatment in patients with failed fibrinolysis complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Background
Most patients with STEMI receive fibrinolytic therapy and aspirin. The management of failed fibrinolysis is unclear.
Methods
A total of 307 patients with STEMI and failed fibrinolysis were randomized to emergency coronary angiography with or without rescue PCI or conservative treatment.
Results
Thirty-day all-cause mortality was similar in the rescue and conservative groups (9.8% vs. 11%, p = 0.7, risk difference [RD] 1.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −5.8 to 8.3). The composite secondary end point of death/re-infarction/stroke/subsequent revascularization/heart failure occurred less frequently in the rescue group (37.3% vs. 50%, p = 0.02, RD 12.7%, 95% CI 1.6 to 23.5), driven by less subsequent revascularization (6.5% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.01, RD 13.6%, 95% CI 6.2 to 21.4). Re-infarction and clinical heart failure were less common in the rescue group (7.2% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.3, RD 3.2%, 95% CI −3.3 to 9.9; and 24.2% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.3, RD 5.7%, 95% CI −4.3 to 15.6, respectively). Strokes and transfusions were more common in the rescue group (4.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.03, RD 3.9%, 95% CI 0.5 to 8.6; and 11.1% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001, RD 9.8%, 95% CI 4.9 to 19.9, respectively). Left ventricular function at 30 days was the same in the two groups.
Conclusions
Rescue angioplasty did not improve survival by 30 days, but improved event-free survival, almost completely due to a reduction in subsequent revascularization. Rescue angioplasty was associated with more strokes and more transfusions and did not result in preservation of left ventricular systolic function at 30 days.
Keywords
PCI , Left ventricular , CABG , Risk difference , Percutaneous coronary intervention , Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , merlin , LV , TIMI , Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction , STEMI , ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction , Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction trial , RD , RWMI , regional wall motion index
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
459269
Link To Document