Title of article :
Planimetry of Mitral Valve Stenosis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Behrus Djavidani، نويسنده , , Kurt Debl، نويسنده , , Markus Lenhart، نويسنده , , Johannes Seitz، نويسنده , , Christian Paetzel، نويسنده , , Franz X. Schmid، نويسنده , , Wolfgang R. Nitz، نويسنده , , Stefan Feuerbach، نويسنده , , Günter Riegger، نويسنده , , Andreas Luchner، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Abstract :
Objectives
We sought to determine whether noninvasive planimetry of the mitral valve area (MVA) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is feasible and reliable in patients with mitral stenosis (MS).
Background
Accurate assessment of MVA is particularly important for the management of patients with valvular stenosis. Current standard techniques for assessing the severity of MS include echocardiography (ECHO) and cardiac catheterization (CATH).
Methods
In 22 patients with suspected or known MS, planimetry of MVA was performed with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner using a breath-hold balanced gradient echo sequence (true FISP). Data were compared with echocardiographically determined MVA (ECHO-MVA, n = 22), as well as with invasively calculated MVA by the Gorlin-formula at (CATH-MVA, n = 17).
Results
The correlation between MRI- and CATH-MVA was 0.89 (p < 0.0001), and the correlation between MRI- and ECHO-MVA was 0.81 (p < 0.0001). The MRI-MVA slightly overestimated CATH-MVA by 5.0% (1.60 ± 0.45 cm2 vs. 1.52 ± 0.49 cm2, p = NS) and ECHO-MVA by 8.1% (1.61 ± 0.42 cm2 vs. 1.48 ± 0.42 cm2, p < 0.05). On receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, a value of MRI-MVA below 1.65 cm2 indicated mitral stenosis (CATH-MVA ≤1.5 cm2), with a good sensitivity and specificity (89% and 75%, respectively).
Conclusions
Magnetic resonance planimetry of the mitral valve orifice in mitral stenosis offers a reliable and safe method for noninvasive quantification of mitral stenosis. In the clinical management of patients with mitral stenosis, it has to be considered that planimetry by MRI slightly overestimates MVA, as compared with MVA calculated echocardiographically and at catheterization.
Keywords :
magnetic resonance imaging , MRI , echocardiography , MS , cardiac catheterization , mitral stenosis , CATH , echo , MVA , mitral valve area
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)