Title of article :
Predictive Value of Ventricular Arrhythmia Inducibility for Subsequent Ventricular Tachycardia or Ventricular Fibrillation in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II Patients Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
James P. Daubert، نويسنده , , Wojciech Zareba، نويسنده , , W. Jackson Hall، نويسنده , , Claudio Schuger، نويسنده , , Andrew Corsello، نويسنده , , Angel R. Leon، نويسنده , , Mark L. Andrews، نويسنده , , Scott McNitt، نويسنده , , David T. Huang، نويسنده , , Arthur J. Moss and MADIT II Study Investigators، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Abstract :
Objectives
We correlated electrophysiologic inducibility with spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II.
Background
In the MADIT II study, 593 (82%) of 720 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) randomized patients underwent electrophysiologic testing. Patients received an ICD whether they were inducible or not.
Methods
A “standard” inducibility definition included sustained monomorphic or polymorphic VT induced with three or fewer extrastimuli or VF induced with two or fewer extrastimuli. We compared a narrow inducibility definition (only monomorphic VT) and a broad definition (standard definition plus VF with three extrastimuli). We used ICD-stored electrograms to categorize spontaneous VT or VF.
Results
Inducible patients (standard definition) had a greater likelihood of experiencing ICD therapy for VT than noninducible patients (p = 0.023). Unexpectedly, ICD therapy for spontaneous VF was less common (p = 0.021) in inducible patients than in noninducible patients. The two-year Kaplan-Meier event rate for VT or VF was 29.4% for inducible patients and 25.5% for noninducible patients. Standard inducibility did not predict the combined end point of VT or VF (p = 0.280, by log-rank analysis). The narrow inducibility definition outperformed the standard definition, whereas the broad definition appeared inferior to the standard definition.
Conclusions
In the MADIT II study patients, inducibility was associated with an increased likelihood of VT. Noninducible MADIT II study subjects using this electrophysiologic protocol had a considerable VT event rate and a higher VF event rate than inducible patients. Induction of polymorphic VT or VF, even with double extrastimuli, appears less relevant than induction of monomorphic VT.
Keywords :
myocardial infarction , ATP , Hazard ratio , MI , Ventricular tachycardia , ICD , EP , Vf , RV , anti-tachycardia pacing , HR , ventricular fibrillation , VT , implantable cardioverter-defibrillator , right ventricular , electrophysiologic , MADIT , Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)