Title of article
Are Neurology residents in the United States being taught defensive medicine?
Author/Authors
Roland Brilla، نويسنده , , Stefan Evers، نويسنده , , Angela Deutschl?nder، نويسنده , , Katja Elfriede Wartenberg، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
4
From page
374
To page
377
Abstract
Objective
To study whether and how fear of litigation and defensive medicine are communicated during residency training and to assess whether this affects residents’ attitudes.
Methods
Neurology residents in the US (n = 25) and, as a control group, Neurology residents training in Germany (n = 42) were asked to rate multiple items regarding litigation, defensive strategies and how often these issues are raised by teaching physicians. Statistic analysis was performed using nonparametric tests.
Results
Residents in both countries indicated that litigation is an “important problem”, although US residents stated this significantly more often (p < 0.001). Initiation of tests motivated mainly by fear of litigation (p = 0.004) and explicit teaching of defensive strategies by teaching physicians (p < 0.02) were reported more often by US residents.
Conclusion
Neurology residents in both the US and Germany perceive a litigational threat, but significantly less so in Germany. This difference may result at least in part from teaching of defensive strategies reported more often in US programs.
Keywords
Litigation , Malpractice , Defensive medicine , Residency education , Tort signal
Journal title
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Record number
464280
Link To Document