Title of article :
Can aspirin resistance be clinically predicted in stroke patients?
Author/Authors :
Jung Im Seok، نويسنده , , In Soo Joo، نويسنده , , Jung Han Yoon، نويسنده , , Yun Jung Choi، نويسنده , , Phil Hyu Lee، نويسنده , , Kyoon Huh، نويسنده , , Oh Young Bang، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Abstract :
Objectives
Aspirin resistance is one of several possible explanations for limited efficacy or treatment failure of aspirin. However, the predictors of aspirin resistance are not well known. We therefore conducted a study of laboratory-defined aspirin resistance in Korean patients with ischemic stroke and considered a wide range of factors as possible predictors.
Patients and methods
A total of 88 patients taking aspirin daily for the secondary prevention of stroke were included. Platelet function was assessed using the Rapid Platelet Function Assay-Aspirin (RPFA-ASA) system and the level of urinary thromboxane B2 (TX-B2). The result of the RPFA-ASA system was expressed as an aspirin reaction unit (ARU). We analyzed a wide range of factors including demographic data, stroke risk factors, and laboratory findings to identify the clinical predictors of aspirin resistance.
Results
Eleven (12%) patients were identified as aspirin resistant by the ARU criteria. Univariate analysis showed that an older age, lower LDL cholesterol levels, and concurrent use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or receptor blockers were related to aspirin resistance by ARU criteria. Aspirin resistance by urinary TX-B2 criteria was observed in 18 (25%) patients and associated with an older age, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, cigarette smoking, and the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or receptor blockers. In multivariate analysis, this association lost significance by ARU criteria, and only lower fibrinogen levels were associated with increased risk by TX-B2 criteria. In addition, the stroke subtypes and the degree of atherosclerosis were not associated with aspirin resistance. The correlation between the two criteria was poor (r = −0.115, p = 0.34).
Conclusion
Despite the comprehensive analysis of this study, we failed to identify independent predictors for laboratory-defined aspirin resistance. Additionally, little overlap was found between the two criteria with which to assess aspirin resistance.
Keywords :
aspirin , ischemic stroke , Aspirin resistance
Journal title :
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Journal title :
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery