Title of article :
Patients who challenge
Author/Authors :
Michael Ward، نويسنده , , Luciano Floridi and Julian Savulescu ، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages :
19
From page :
545
To page :
563
Abstract :
Individuals have different values. They seek to express their individuality even when receiving medical care. It is a part of modern medical practice and respect for patient autonomy to show respect for different values. We give an account of what it means to respect different values and challenging patients in medical practice. Challenging choices are often choices which are perceived by many to be either irrational or against a personʹs interests, such as engaging in harmful or excessively risky activities. When the medical profession is involved in such choices, the basic medical principle of acting in a personʹs best interests is challenged. Often doctors refuse to respect controversial choices on paternalistic grounds. We should all respect and facilitate the controversial choices of competent individuals, subject to resource limitations, our own and others well-being and autonomy, and the public interest. But more importantly, sometimes such choices make for a better, more autonomous life. Sometimes, such choices reflect considerations of global well-being or altruism, or idiosyncratic attitudes to risk. Sometimes, they reflect unusual values. However, in some other cases, controversial choices are irrational and are not expressions of our autonomy. Doctors should assist patients to make rational if individual choices. The patient also bears the responsibility for bringing his beliefs to the attention of the clinician.
Keywords :
ETHICS , Paternalism , Autonomy , refusal of treatment , patient values , patient choice , best interests.
Journal title :
Best Practice and Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Serial Year :
2006
Journal title :
Best Practice and Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
Record number :
465109
Link To Document :
بازگشت