Title of article
Measuring clinical pain in chronic widespread pain: selected methodological issues
Author/Authors
Michael Gendreau، نويسنده , , Michael R. Hufford، نويسنده , , Arthur A. Stone، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages
18
From page
575
To page
592
Abstract
Assessing clinical pain is an important task in clinical practice and research. A large empirical literature has documented that patientsʹ pain reports can be systematically biased by a number of methodological factors. This chapter reviews a selection of methodological issues that can affect pain ratings, including: the impact of recall bias, the use of paper and electronic diaries to assess pain experiences, ecological momentary assessment methods as a way of capturing real-time pain data in the real world, and pain scaling and data analysis considerations. Data from a recent study that implemented an electronic diary for capturing real-time pain data are presented and reviewed in the context of the methodological factors reviewed above. It is concluded that methodological factors can greatly affect our understanding of patientsʹ pain experiences
Keywords
Recall bias , Ecological momentary assessment , Methodological , Gracely pain scale.
Journal title
Best Practice and Research Clinical Rheumatology
Serial Year
2003
Journal title
Best Practice and Research Clinical Rheumatology
Record number
467018
Link To Document