• Title of article

    Measuring clinical pain in chronic widespread pain: selected methodological issues

  • Author/Authors

    Michael Gendreau، نويسنده , , Michael R. Hufford، نويسنده , , Arthur A. Stone، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
  • Pages
    18
  • From page
    575
  • To page
    592
  • Abstract
    Assessing clinical pain is an important task in clinical practice and research. A large empirical literature has documented that patientsʹ pain reports can be systematically biased by a number of methodological factors. This chapter reviews a selection of methodological issues that can affect pain ratings, including: the impact of recall bias, the use of paper and electronic diaries to assess pain experiences, ecological momentary assessment methods as a way of capturing real-time pain data in the real world, and pain scaling and data analysis considerations. Data from a recent study that implemented an electronic diary for capturing real-time pain data are presented and reviewed in the context of the methodological factors reviewed above. It is concluded that methodological factors can greatly affect our understanding of patientsʹ pain experiences
  • Keywords
    Recall bias , Ecological momentary assessment , Methodological , Gracely pain scale.
  • Journal title
    Best Practice and Research Clinical Rheumatology
  • Serial Year
    2003
  • Journal title
    Best Practice and Research Clinical Rheumatology
  • Record number

    467018