Title of article :
Concordance between qualitative and quantitative cultures in burned patients: Analysis of 2886 cultures
Author/Authors :
Stefan Danilla، نويسنده , , Patricio Andrades، نويسنده , , Mar?a E. G?mez، نويسنده , , Marcela Chamorro، نويسنده , , Patricio Leniz، نويسنده , , Jose L. Pi?eros، نويسنده , , Sergio Llanos، نويسنده , , Hector Roco، نويسنده , , Gerardo Correa، نويسنده , , Juan A. Pasten، نويسنده , , Alex Eulufi، نويسنده , , Ricardo Roa، نويسنده , , Wilfredo Calderon، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
5
From page :
967
To page :
971
Abstract :
Objective To determine the concordance between superficial cultures (SC) and quantitative cultures (QC) in the diagnosis of wound infection in burn patients. Method Sample: All SC and QC taken from the same patient, site and during the same surgery were analysed. Variables: On the SC, the microorganism (MO) and its amount defined subjectively by the microbiologist was recorded (negative, very low, low, regular and abundant). On the QC, the MO and its amount were expressed as colony forming units per gram of tissue (CFUs/g). Statistics: Kappa index of agreement beyond chance; Wilcoxon and Kruskall-Wallis for continuous variables and χ2 for categorical variables were used with a p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results One thousand four hundred and forty three pairs of cultures were analyzed. The concordance between SC and QC (Kappa index) was 52%. On the SC, only when the microbiologist subjectively informed “abundant” MOs there was a significant difference (p < 0.0001). There were 6.1% of QCs with more than 105 CFUs/g and the most frequent MOs isolated were: S. aureus (27.9%), E. coli (11.6%), P. aeruginosa (11.6%), E. faecalis (11.6%) and S. epidermidis (7.0%). Conclusions SC has a moderate concordance with the QC showing a low reliability between the two methods. The subjective information given by the microbiology technician in the SC is not precise. A study in which the two methods be compared blindly against the reference standard, in a prospective cohort of patients, it is needed to discriminate which of two methods it is the most accurate one determining sensitivity and specificity
Keywords :
sensitivity , specificity , Correlation , Surface , quantitative , CULTURES , Wound , Burn infection , Swab , Diagnosis study , Kappa index
Journal title :
Burns
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
Burns
Record number :
470988
Link To Document :
بازگشت