Title of article :
Value of Low-Density Lipoprotein Particle Number and Size as Predictors of Coronary Artery Disease in Apparently Healthy Men and Women: The EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Karim El Harchaoui، نويسنده , , Wim A. van der Steeg، نويسنده , , Erik S.G. Stroes، نويسنده , , Jan Albert Kuivenhoven، نويسنده , , James D. Otvos، نويسنده , , Nicholas J. Wareham، نويسنده , , Barbara A. Hutten، نويسنده , , John J.P. Kastelein، نويسنده , , Kay-Tee Khaw، نويسنده , , S. Matthijs Boekholdt، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Abstract :
Objectives
We assessed relations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle number (LDL-P) and LDL particle size as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and the risk of future coronary artery disease (CAD).
Background
Whereas LDL-C is an established risk factor for CAD, its discriminative power is limited. Measuring LDL-P and size may have stronger associations with CAD than LDL-C.
Methods
A nested case-control study was performed in the prospective EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk study, which comprises 25,663 subjects. Cases (n = 1,003) were individuals who developed CAD during 6 year follow-up. Control subjects (n = 1,885) were matched for age, gender, and enrollment time. Odds ratios (ORs) for future CAD were calculated, and we also evaluated whether LDL-P could improve the Framingham risk score (FRS) to predict CAD.
Results
In univariate analyses, LDL-P (OR 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58 to 2.59) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C) (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.69) were more closely associated with CAD than LDL-C (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.18). The additional value of LDL-P was lost after adjustment for HDL-C and triglyceride levels. Whereas LDL size was inversely related to CAD (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.76), this relation was abolished upon adjustment for LDL-P. In a model adjusted for the FRS, LDL-P retained its association with CAD (p for trend 0.02).
Conclusions
In this large study of individuals with moderately elevated LDL-C, LDL-P was related to CAD on top of FRS as well as after adjusting for LDL-C. The additional value of LDL-P was comparable to non–HDL-C, and it was abolished after adjusting for triglycerides and HDL-C.
Keywords :
odds ratio , body mass index , nuclear magnetic resonance , CAD , NMR , coronary artery disease , HDL-C , APOB , LDL , BMI , low-density lipoprotein , Confidence interval , LDL-C , Apolipoprotein B , OR , CI , high-density lipoprotein cholesterol , low-density lipoprotein cholesterol , FRS , Framingham risk score , LDL-P , low-density lipoprotein-particle number
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)