Title of article :
Carvedilol Protects Better Against Vascular Events Than Metoprolol in Heart Failure: Results From COMET Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Willem J. Remme، نويسنده , , Christian Torp-Pedersen and DIAMOND Study Group، نويسنده , , John G.F. Cleland، نويسنده , , Philip A. Poole-Wilson، نويسنده , , Marco Metra، نويسنده , , Michel Komajda، نويسنده , , Karl Swedberg، نويسنده , , Andrea Di Lenarda، نويسنده , , Phillip Spark، نويسنده , , Armin Scherhag، نويسنده , , Christine Moullet، نويسنده , , Mary Ann Lukas، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages :
9
From page :
963
To page :
971
Abstract :
Objectives We explored whether vascular protection by carvedilol could contribute to its superior effects in the treatment of heart failure (HF) compared with metoprolol tartrate in the COMET (Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial) study. Background Full adrenergic blockade by carvedilol and additional (e.g., antioxidative) properties may lead to vascular protection relative to beta-1 blockade alone, and contribute to its efficacy in HF treatment. Methods Three thousand twenty-nine patients with HF due to ischemic (51%) or idiopathic cardiomyopathy (44%) were randomized double-blind to carvedilol (n = 1,511) or metoprolol (n = 1,518) and followed for 58 months. Vascular end points were cardiovascular death, stroke, stroke death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unstable angina. Results The effect of carvedilol on cardiovascular death improved consistently in subgroups with prespecified baseline variables. Myocardial infarctions were reported in 69 carvedilol and 94 metoprolol patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 0.97, p = 0.03). Cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI combined were reduced by 19% in carvedilol (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92, p = 0.0009 vs. metoprolol). Unstable angina was reported as an adverse event in 56 carvedilol and in 77 metoprolol patients (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.501 to 0.998, p = 0.049). A stroke occurred in 65 carvedilol and 80 metoprolol patients (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.10). Stroke or MI combined occurred in 130 carvedilol and 168 metoprolol patients (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.95, p = 0.015), and fatal MI or fatal stroke occurred in 34 carvedilol and in 72 metoprolol patients (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.69, p = 0.0002). Death after a nonfatal MI or stroke occurred in 61 of 124 carvedilol and in 106 of 160 metoprolol patients (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.90, p = 0.0086). Conclusions Carvedilol improves vascular outcomes better than metoprolol. These results suggest a ubiquitous protective effect of carvedilol against major vascular events.
Keywords :
ACE , myocardial infarction , heart failure , angiotensin-converting enzyme , Confidence interval , Hazard ratio , MI , CI , Hf , NYHA , New York Heart Association , HR , LVEF , left ventricular ejection fraction
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2007
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
472387
Link To Document :
بازگشت