Title of article :
Acute Myocardial Infarction With Hyperoxemic Therapy (AMIHOT): A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Intracoronary Hyperoxemic Reperfusion After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
William W. O’Neill، نويسنده , , Jack L. Martin، نويسنده , , Simon R. Dixon، نويسنده , , Antonio L. Bartorelli، نويسنده , , Daniela Trabattoni، نويسنده , , Pranobe V. Oemrawsingh، نويسنده , , Douwe E. Atsma، نويسنده , , Michael Chang، نويسنده , , William Marquardt، نويسنده , , Jae K. Oh، نويسنده , , Mitchell W. Krucoff، نويسنده , , Raymond J. Gibbons، نويسنده , , J. Richard Spears and AMIHOT Investigators، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages :
9
From page :
397
To page :
405
Abstract :
Objectives This study sought to determine whether hyperoxemic reperfusion with aqueous oxygen (AO) improves recovery of ventricular function after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background Hyperbaric oxygen reduces myocardial injury and improves ventricular function when administered during ischemia-reperfusion. Methods In a prospective, multicenter study, 269 patients with acute anterior or large inferior AMI undergoing primary or rescue PCI (<24 h from symptom onset) were randomly assigned after successful PCI to receive hyperoxemic reperfusion (treatment group) or normoxemic blood autoreperfusion (control group). Hyperoxemic reperfusion was performed for 90 min using intracoronary AO. The primary end points were final infarct size at 14 days, ST-segment resolution, and Δ regional wall motion score index of the infarct zone at 3 months. Results At 30 days, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was similar between the control and AO groups (5.2% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.62). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary end points between the study groups. In post-hoc analysis, anterior AMI patients reperfused <6 h who were treated with AO had a greater improvement in regional wall motion (Δ wall motion score index = 0.54 in control group vs. 0.75 in AO group, p = 0.03), smaller infarct size (23% of left ventricle in control group vs. 9% of left ventricle in AO group, p = 0.04), and improved ST-segment resolution compared with normoxemic controls. Conclusions Intracoronary hyperoxemic reperfusion was safe and well tolerated after PCI for AMI, but did not improve regional wall motion, ST-segment resolution, or final infarct size. A possible treatment effect was observed in anterior AMI patients reperfused <6 h of symptom onset.
Keywords :
PCI , Acute myocardial infarction , Percutaneous coronary intervention , TIMI , Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction , Ao , AM I , aqueous oxygen , RWMSI , regional wall motion score index
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2007
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
472682
Link To Document :
بازگشت