• Title of article

    Noninvasive Risk Assessment Early After a Myocardial Infarction: The REFINE Study Original Research Article

  • Author/Authors

    Derek V. Exner، نويسنده , , Katherine M. Kavanagh، نويسنده , , Michael P. Slawnych، نويسنده , , L. Brent Mitchell، نويسنده , , Darlene Ramadan، نويسنده , , Sandeep G. Aggarwal، نويسنده , , Catherine Noullett، نويسنده , , Allie Van Schaik، نويسنده , , Ryan T. Mitchell، نويسنده , , Mariko A. Shibata، نويسنده , , Sajad Gulamhussein، نويسنده , , James McMeekin، نويسنده , , Wayne Tymchak، نويسنده , , Gregory Schnell، نويسنده , , Anne M. Gillis، نويسنده , , Robert S. Sheldon، نويسنده , , Gordon H. Fick، نويسنده , , Henry J. Duff and REFINE Investigators، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    2275
  • To page
    2284
  • Abstract
    Objectives This study sought to determine whether combined assessment of autonomic tone plus cardiac electrical substrate identifies most patients at risk of serious events after myocardial infarction (MI) and to compare assessment at 2 to 4 weeks versus 10 to 14 weeks after MI. Background Methods to identify most patients at risk of serious events after MI are required. Methods Patients (n = 322) with an ejection fraction (EF) <0.50 in the initial week after MI were followed up for a median of 47 months. Serial assessment of autonomic tone, including heart rate turbulence (HRT), electrical substrate, including T-wave alternans (TWA), and EF was performed, interpreted blinded, and categorized using pre-specified cut-points where available. The primary outcome was cardiac death or resuscitated cardiac arrest. All-cause mortality and fatal or nonfatal cardiac arrest were secondary outcomes. Results Mean EF significantly increased over the initial 8 weeks after MI. Testing 2 to 4 weeks after MI did not reliably identify patients at risk, whereas testing at 10 to 14 weeks did. The 20% of patients with impaired HRT, abnormal exercise TWA, and an EF <0.50 beyond 8 weeks post-MI had a 5.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4 to 11.3, p < 0.001) higher adjusted risk of the primary outcome. This combination identified 52% of those at risk, with good positive (23%; 95% CI 17% to 26%) and negative (95%; 95% CI 93% to 97%) accuracy. Similar results were observed for the secondary outcomes. Conclusions Impaired HRT, abnormal TWA, and an EF <0.50 beyond 8 weeks after MI reliably identify patients at risk of serious events. (Assessment of Noninvasive Methods to Identify Patients at Risk of Serious Arrhythmias After a Heart Attack; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00399503?order=1; NCT00399503)
  • Keywords
    myocardial infarction , Heart rate variability , HRT , Left ventricular , Confidence interval , AUC , TWA , MI , ICD , ECG , CI , HRV , LV , LVEF , left ventricular ejection fraction , implantable cardioverter-defibrillator , baroreflex sensitivity , T-wave alternans , electrocardiograph/electrocardiographic , BRS , area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve , heart rate turbulence , VPB , ventricular premature beats
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Serial Year
    2007
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Record number

    472974