Effects of Intracavitary Blood Flow and Electrode–Target Distance on Radiofrequency Power Required for Transient Conduction Block in Langendorff-Perfused Canine Model

Objectives. We sought to quantify the effects of electrode–target distance and intracavitary blood flow on radiofrequency (RF) power required to induce transient conduction block, using Langendorff-perfused canine ablation model. Background. Given the thermally mediated nature of RF catheter ablation, cooling effects of intracavitary blood flow and electrode–target distance will influence lesion extension and geometry and electrophysiologic effects. Methods. In eight Langendorff-perfused canine hearts, the right ventricular free wall was opened, and the right bundle branch (RBB) carefully localized by multielectrode activation mapping. The right atrium was paced at cycle length of 500 ms. Proximal and distal electrodes were attached at the endocardial aspect of the RBB, and the perfused heart was submerged in heparinized blood at 37°C. standard 4-mm tip ablation electrode was positioned at constant contact pressure of 5g between the two electrodes at the site of maximal RBB potential (0 mm) and 2 and 4 mm distant from this site along line perpendicular to the RBB. RF pulses (500 kHz) were delivered for 30s at 0.5-W increments until transient bundle branch block. In four hearts, intracavitary flow was simulated by directing 30-cm/s jet of blood parallel to the septum at the ablation site, and the protocol was repeated to assess the effects on power required for block. In one heart, the effect of variable flow was assessed (0, 15 and 30 cm/s). Results. An exponential distance-related increase was seen in power required for block, from 1.8 ± 0.9 W (mean ± SD) at 0 mm to 5.4 ± 1.1 W at 4 mm. In the presence of 30-cm/s flow, an increase to 3.9 ± 0.8 W at 0 mm and 13.1 ± 2.4 W at 2 mm was seen. At 4 mm, coagulum formation invariably occurred before block could be induced. For 15-cm/s flow, less power was required: 3 and 7 W at 0 and 2 mm, respectively. Conclusions. Increasing the ablation electrode–target distance causes an exponential increase in power required for conduction block; this relation is profoundly influenced by intracavitary flow. Given the geometry of endomyocardial RF lesions, these findings are particularly relevant for directly subendocardial ablation targets.