Primary angioplasty versus systemic thrombolysis in anterior myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES This study compares the efficacy of primary angioplasty and systemic thrombolysis with t-P in reducing the in-hospital mortality of patients with anterior AMI. BACKGROUND Controversy still exists about the relative benefit of primary angioplasty over thrombolysis as treatment for AMI. METHODS Two-hundred and twenty patients with anterior AMI were randomly assigned in our institution to primary angioplasty (109 patients) or systemic thrombolysis with accelerated t-P (111 patients) within the first five hours from the onset of symptoms. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Primary angioplasty was independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality (2.8% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.02, adjusted odds ratio 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.85). During hospitalization, patients treated by angioplasty had lower frequency of postinfarction angin or positive stress test (11.9% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.01) and less frequently underwent percutaneous or surgical revascularization after the initial treatment (22.0% vs. 47.7%, p < 0.001) than did patients treated by t-PA. At six month follow-up, patients treated by angioplasty had lower cumulative rate of death (4.6% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.05) and revascularization (31.2% vs. 55.9%, p < 0.001) than those treated by t-PA. CONCLUSIONS In centers with an experienced and readily available interventional team, primary angioplasty is superior to t-P for the treatment of anterior AMI.