Title of article :
Assessment of regional and global left ventricular function by reinjection Tl-201 and rest Tc-99m sestamibi ECG-gated SPECT: Comparison with three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging
Author/Authors :
Eiji Tadamura، نويسنده , , Takashi Kudoh، نويسنده , , Makoto Motooka، نويسنده , , Masayuki Inubushi، نويسنده , , Seiji Shirakawa، نويسنده , , Naoy Hattori، نويسنده , , Tomohis Okada، نويسنده , , Tetsuy Matsuda، نويسنده , , Takaaki Koshiji، نويسنده , , Kazunobu Nishimura، نويسنده , , Katsuhiko Matsuda، نويسنده , , Junji Konishi، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Pages :
7
From page :
991
To page :
997
Abstract :
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to test the ability of reinjection thallium-201 and rest technetium-99m sestamibi ECG (electrocardiographic)-gated SPECT (i.e., reinjection-g-SPECT [single-photon emission computed tomography] and MIBI-g-SPECT) to determine regional and global functional parameters. BACKGROUND The ECG-gated perfusion SPECT was reported to provide accurate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using an automated algorithm. We hypothesized that other various functional dat may be obtained using reinjection-g-SPECT and MIBI-g-SPECT. METHODS Reinjection-g-SPECT, MIBI-g-SPECT, and three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3DMRI) were conducted in 20 patients with coronary artery disease. Regional wall motion (RWM) and wall thickening (RWT) were analyzed using semiquantitative visual scoring by each g-SPECT and 3DMRI. The left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes (EDV, ESV) and LVEF estimated by reinjection- and MIBI-g-SPECT were compared with the results of 3DMRI. RESULTS high degree of agreement in RWM and RWT assessment was observed between each g-SPECT and 3DMRI (kapp >.70, p < .001). The LVEF values by reinjection- and MIBI-g-SPECT correlated and agreed well with those by 3DMRI (reinjection: r = .92, SEE = 5.9%, SD of differences = 5.7%; sestamibi: r = .94, SEE = 4.4%, SD of differences = 5.1%). The same also pertained to EDV (reinjection: r = .85, SEE = 18.7 ml, SD of differences = 18.4 ml; sestamibi: r = .92, SEE = 13.1 ml, SD of differences = 13.0 ml) and ESV (reinjection: r = .94, SEE = 10.3 ml, SD of differences = 10.3 ml; sestamibi: r = .97, SEE = 6.7 ml [p < .05 vs. reinjection by F test], SD of differences = 6.6 ml [p < .05 vs. reinjection by F test]). CONCLUSIONS Reinjection- and MIBI-g-SPECT provide clinically satisfactory various functional data. These functional dat in combination with the perfusion information will improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy without an increase in cost or the radiation dose to the patients.
Keywords :
ECG , SPECT , thallium-201 , technetium-99m , Left ventricular , Tc-99m , Electrocardiogram , LV , LVEF , left ventricular ejection fraction , EDV , Tl-201 , electrocardiographic , left ventricular end-diastolic volume , left ventricular end-systolic volume , ESV , single-photon emission computed tomography (tomographic) , reinjection Tl-201 ECG-gated SPECT , reinjection-g-SPECT , rest Tc-99m sestamibi ECG-gated SPECT , MIBI-g-SPECT
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
1999
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
481097
Link To Document :
بازگشت