Title of article
Are there two qualitatively distinct forms of dissociation? A review and some clinical implications
Author/Authors
Emily A. Holmes، نويسنده , , Richard J. Brown، نويسنده , , Warren Mansell، نويسنده , , R. Pasco Fearon، نويسنده , , Elaine C.M. Hunter، نويسنده , , Frank Frasquilho، نويسنده , , David A. Oakley، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
23
From page
1
To page
23
Abstract
This review aims to clarify the use of the term ‘dissociation’ in theory, research and clinical practice. Current psychiatric definitions of dissociation are contrasted with recent conceptualizations that have converged on a dichotomy between two qualitatively different phenomena: ‘detachment’ and ‘compartmentalization’. We review some evidence for this distinction within the domains of phenomenology, factor analysis of self-report scales and experimental research. Available evidence supports the distinction but more controlled evaluations are needed. We conclude with recommendations for future research and clinical practice, proposing that using this dichotomy can lead to clearer case formulation and an improved choice of treatment strategy. Examples are provided within Depersonalization Disorder, Conversion Disorder and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
Keywords
detachment , Dissociation , PTSD , Amnesia , Dissociative , compartmentalization
Journal title
Clinical Psychology Review
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
Clinical Psychology Review
Record number
483812
Link To Document