Title of article :
Safety and effectiveness of large-volume enema solutions
Author/Authors :
Marilee Schmelzer، نويسنده , , Lawrence R. Schiller، نويسنده , , Richard Meyer، نويسنده , , Susan M. Rugari، نويسنده , , Patti Case، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages :
10
From page :
265
To page :
274
Abstract :
The effectiveness and side effects of three types of enema solutions were compared in healthy subjects. Using a repeated-measures, double-blind design, the three different enemas (soapsuds, tap water, and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution) were given at 1-week intervals to 24 healthy volunteers. Soapsuds and tap water enemas produced significantly greater returns than polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and were also more uncomfortable. Rectal biopsies showed surface epithelium loss after soapsuds and tap water but not after PEG-ES enemas. Before recommending changes in nursing practice, further research is needed to determine the mechanism for the surface epithelium damage and to determine if this damage produces a stronger defecation stimulus and discomfort.
Journal title :
Applied Nursing Research
Serial Year :
2004
Journal title :
Applied Nursing Research
Record number :
484457
Link To Document :
بازگشت