Title of article
Safety and effectiveness of large-volume enema solutions
Author/Authors
Marilee Schmelzer، نويسنده , , Lawrence R. Schiller، نويسنده , , Richard Meyer، نويسنده , , Susan M. Rugari، نويسنده , , Patti Case، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
10
From page
265
To page
274
Abstract
The effectiveness and side effects of three types of enema solutions were compared in healthy subjects. Using a repeated-measures, double-blind design, the three different enemas (soapsuds, tap water, and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution) were given at 1-week intervals to 24 healthy volunteers. Soapsuds and tap water enemas produced significantly greater returns than polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and were also more uncomfortable. Rectal biopsies showed surface epithelium loss after soapsuds and tap water but not after PEG-ES enemas. Before recommending changes in nursing practice, further research is needed to determine the mechanism for the surface epithelium damage and to determine if this damage produces a stronger defecation stimulus and discomfort.
Journal title
Applied Nursing Research
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
Applied Nursing Research
Record number
484457
Link To Document