• Title of article

    Maximizing Recovery of Native Protein from Aggregates by Optimizing Pressure Treatment

  • Author/Authors

    Robinson، Anne Skaja نويسنده , , Lefebvre، Brian G. نويسنده , , Gage، Matthew J. نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
  • Pages
    -622
  • From page
    623
  • To page
    0
  • Abstract
    Recovering native protein from aggregates is a common obstacle in the production of recombinant proteins. Recent reports have shown that hydrostatic pressure is an attractive alternative to traditional denature-and-dilute techniques, both in terms of yield and process simplicity. To determine the effect of process variables, we subjected tailspike aggregates to a variety of pressure-treatment conditions. Maximum native tailspike yields were obtained with only short pressure incubations (<5 min) at 240 MPa. However, some tailspike aggregates were resistant to pressure, despite multiple cycles of pressure. Extending the postpressure incubation time to 4 days improved the yield of native protein from aggregates from 19.4 (plus_minus) 0.9 to 47.4 (plus_minus) 19.6 (mu)g/mL (approximately 78% yield of native trimer from nonaggregate material). The nearly exclusive conversion of monomer to trimer over the time scale of days, when combined with previous kinetic data, allows for the identification of three postpressure kinetic phases: a rapid phase consisting of structured dimer conversion to trimer (30 min), an intermediate phase consisting of monomer conversion to aggregate (100 min), and a slow phase consisting of conversion of monomer to trimer (days). Optimizing the production of structured dimer can yield the highest level of folded protein. Typical refolding additives, such as glycerol, or low-temperature incubation did not improve yields.
  • Keywords
    Aphthona czwalinae , Aphthona flava , Aphthona lacertosa , Aphthona nigriscutis , Biological control , Spurgia esulae , IPM , Euphorbia esula , Endangered species , Invasive weeds , Leafy spurge flea beetles
  • Journal title
    BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
  • Serial Year
    2004
  • Journal title
    BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
  • Record number

    4892