• Title of article

    Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centres: relevance to the Eurocleft Study

  • Author/Authors

    M. J. Trenouth، نويسنده , , G. Laitung، نويسنده , , A. J. Naftel، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    19
  • To page
    24
  • Abstract
    Cephalometric data from five different geographical areas (Oslo, Manchester, London, Nijmegen, and Michigan) were compared. The angles SNA, SNB, and ANB were taken from published tables in the form of mean, standard deviation (SD) and number in the sample, divided up by age and sex. Angles SNA and SNB were significantly different among centres on univariate analysis. The Oslo data showed 23 instances in which they differed significantly from the other data, London 16, Manchester 11, Nijmegen 11, and Michigan 7. Multivariate analysis using Penrose distances were Oslo (2.04), Manchester (1.39), London (0.93), Nijmegen (0.80), and Michigan (0.66). The sums of the Mahalanobis distances were Nijmegen (3.60), Oslo (3.10), London (2.80), Manchester (2.25), and Michigan (1.49). As these results probably reflect racial and genetic differences, these must be taken into account when international comparisons are being made, as in the Eurocleft study.
  • Journal title
    British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery
  • Serial Year
    1999
  • Journal title
    British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery
  • Record number

    492506