Title of article
Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centres: relevance to the Eurocleft Study
Author/Authors
M. J. Trenouth، نويسنده , , G. Laitung، نويسنده , , A. J. Naftel، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Pages
6
From page
19
To page
24
Abstract
Cephalometric data from five different geographical areas (Oslo, Manchester, London, Nijmegen, and Michigan) were compared. The angles SNA, SNB, and ANB were taken from published tables in the form of mean, standard deviation (SD) and number in the sample, divided up by age and sex. Angles SNA and SNB were significantly different among centres on univariate analysis. The Oslo data showed 23 instances in which they differed significantly from the other data, London 16, Manchester 11, Nijmegen 11, and Michigan 7. Multivariate analysis using Penrose distances were Oslo (2.04), Manchester (1.39), London (0.93), Nijmegen (0.80), and Michigan (0.66). The sums of the Mahalanobis distances were Nijmegen (3.60), Oslo (3.10), London (2.80), Manchester (2.25), and Michigan (1.49). As these results probably reflect racial and genetic differences, these must be taken into account when international comparisons are being made, as in the Eurocleft study.
Journal title
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery
Serial Year
1999
Journal title
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery
Record number
492506
Link To Document