• Title of article

    Evaluation of cavitations in proximal caries lesions at various magnification levels in vitro

  • Author/Authors

    Andrej M. Kielbassa، نويسنده , , Sebastian Paris، نويسنده , , Adrian Lussi، نويسنده , , Hendrik Meyer-Lueckel، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    817
  • To page
    822
  • Abstract
    Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the cavitation rate of proximal caries using different magnification aids in vitro. Methods Radiographs of 285 extracted teeth were taken and the proximal surfaces were graded to the criteria R0 (no radiolucency), R1 (radiolucency confined to the outer half of enamel), R2 (inner half of enamel) and R3 (outer half of dentin). Subsequently, the proximal surfaces were checked for the presence of cavitations with the naked eye (NE), and by using 4.3× magnification eyeglasses (ME), a stereo microscope (SM, 10×), or a scanning electron microscope (SEM, up to 2000× magnification). Results In surfaces with R3 caries, cavitations were visible in 56 of 59 cases with the naked eye. When using SEM, all surfaces revealed cavitations (100%). Regarding the surfaces with R2 lesion, 36 of 46 cases showed cavitations (NE); the corresponding values were 39/46 (ME), 41/46 (SM), and 46/46 (SEM); in the latter, in most cases deep defects could be observed. With regard to R1 lesions, 36/60 (NE), 43/60 (ME), 45/60 (SM), and 58/60 (SEM) cases revealed cavitations. A breakdown of radiographically sound surfaces (R0) was present in some 10% of the examined surfaces (24/261, NE; 33/261, SEM). Conclusions Cavitations (defined as breakdown of the surface) are present in significantly more cases than previously reported. This might be an explanation why even small radiolucencies tend to progress, albeit slowly. Thus, close follow-ups should strongly be recommended when considering a preventive treatment regimen with small radiolucencies.
  • Keywords
    Proximal cariesCavitationRadiographIn vitroMagnificationSensitivity
  • Journal title
    Journal of Dentistry
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    Journal of Dentistry
  • Record number

    507572