• Title of article

    Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: A non-linear finite element study

  • Author/Authors

    Heng-Li Huang، نويسنده , , Jui-Ting Hsu، نويسنده , , Lih-Jyh Fuh، نويسنده , , Ming-Gene Tu، نويسنده , , Ching-Chang Ko، نويسنده , , Yen-Wen Shen، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    409
  • To page
    417
  • Abstract
    Objectives This study investigated the surrounding bone stress and the implant–bone interfacial sliding of implant designs and implant sizes of immediately loaded implant with maxillary sinus augmentation by using three-dimensional (3D) non-linear finite element (FE) analysis. Methods Twenty-four FE models including four implant designs (cylindrical, threaded, stepped and step-thread implants) and three implant dimensions (standard, long and wide threaded implants) with a bonded and three levels of frictional contact of implant–bone interfaces were analyzed. The maxillary model was constructed from computer tomography (CT) images of a human skull and all 3D implant models were created via the computer-aided design (CAD) software. Results The use of threaded implants decreased the bone stress and sliding distance obviously about 30% as compared with non-threaded (cylindrical and stepped) implants. Increasing the implantʹs length or diameter reduced the bone stress by 13–26%. Employing a immediately loaded implant with smooth machine surface (μ = 0.3, μ represents frictional coefficient) increased the bone stress by 28–63% as compared with the osseointegrated (bonded interfaces) implants. Roughening the implant surface (μ > 0.3) did not reduced the bone stress, however it did decrease the interfacial sliding between implant and bone. Conclusions For an immediately loaded implant placed with sinus augmentation, using threaded implant could decrease both the bone stress and implant–bone sliding distance which may improve the implant initial stability and long-term survival. Rough surface of implants shows no benefit to reduce the bone stress but they could lower the interfacial sliding. On the contrary, employing long or wide implants decrease the bone stress but they cannot diminish the interfacial sliding.
  • Keywords
    Immediately loaded implantsImplant designsSinus augmentationCT-imagingFinite element analysis
  • Journal title
    Journal of Dentistry
  • Serial Year
    2008
  • Journal title
    Journal of Dentistry
  • Record number

    507781