Title of article :
Unexplained renal colic: What is the utility of IV contrast?
Author/Authors :
Frank H. Miller، نويسنده , , Eric Kraemer، نويسنده , , Kshitij Dalal، نويسنده , , Ana Keppke، نويسنده , , Eugene Huo، نويسنده , , Frederick L. Hoff، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
6
From page :
331
To page :
336
Abstract :
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of intravenous (IV) contrast in patients with suspected renal colic and unremarkable unenhanced MDCT. Materials and methods One thousand two hundred and four patients with suspected ureterolithiasis were evaluated with unenhanced MDCT. Seven hundred and eight patients that had additional imaging following IV contrast were our study group. Results Of the patients, 9.4% (67/708) had abnormalities seen only on contrast-enhanced exams. In 53.1% (376/708) of the patients, no additional finding was identified after IV contrast. Conclusion IV contrast in patients with renal colic is rarely helpful.
Keywords :
computed tomography , Kidney CT , contrast media , abdominal pain
Journal title :
Clinical Imaging
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
Clinical Imaging
Record number :
508863
Link To Document :
بازگشت