Microvessel density does not predict outcome in high grade soft tissue sarcoma

The induction of new blood vessel growth into tumours from a pre-existing vascular bed (angiogenesis) is a characteristic of virtually all malignant tumours studied. Previous studies have demonstrated a consistent correlation between the extent of angiogenesis and disease prognosis for a wide range of carcinomas, but not for sarcomas. Aims To investigate the most appropriate method for assessment of microvessel density (MVD) using a cohort of patients with large (>5 cm), deep (intramuscular), high grade soft tissue sarcoma and investigate any relationship between MVD, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and prognosis. Methods Forty-two patients were included in the study. MVD was evaluated in peripheral, central, necrotic and hotspot areas within the tumour by either Chalkley count or total count of immunostained vessels in five high power (×200) visual fields. Results Hot spots of angiogenesis were only present in 33% of specimens. There was a strong correlation p<0.001 between the two methods of quantification with Chalkey method being recommended. VEGF expression evaluated by immunohistochemistry was seen in all but one tumour with strong diffuse cytoplasmic staining within tumour cells, which was not correlated with microvessel density, metastasis or survival. There was a positive correlation between MVD and histological subtype (p<0.01), and primary tumour size and the development of metastasis (p=0.049) but MVD was not predictive of metastasis or overall survival. Conclusions Unlike the majority of previous studies involving various types of carcinoma, there was no correlation between microvessel density and metastasis or survival in a group of patients with large (>5 cm), deep, high grade soft tissue sarcoma.