Title of article
Malingering on the Social Security Disability Consultative Exam: A New Rating Scale
Author/Authors
Michael D. Chafetz، نويسنده , , Joel P. Abrahams، نويسنده , , Joy Kohlmaier، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
14
From page
1
To page
14
Abstract
In disability examinations, benefits may depend on the findings of a psychological consultative examination (PCE), which in Louisiana usually involves a mental status examination and a Wechsler Scale. The disability determinations service (DDS) requires a warning that failure to do oneʹs best may result in an unfavorable decision on the claim, but psychologists are officially discouraged from determining effort by the use of formal effort tests. Consequently, there is a need for internal indicators of effort. Formal testing of effort was undertaken in order to identify indicators of effort within the PCE in WAIS-age and WISC-age claimants. Our findings indicated that the total score of indicators was more predictive of effort than any single indicator. Regression equations yielded information on how much effort contributes to IQ. Classification accuracy for the new rating scale was described for a “dose-response” of effort. Disincentives for malingering detection in the PCE were identified.
Keywords
Malingering , Disability , Social security , mental retardation
Journal title
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Record number
516832
Link To Document