Title of article
A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort
Author/Authors
Michael J. Sharland، نويسنده , , Jeffrey D. Gfeller، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
11
From page
213
To page
223
Abstract
The current study investigated neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to assessing effort and malingering by surveying a sample of NAN professional members and fellows (n = 712). The results from 188 (26.4%) returned surveys indicated that 57% of respondents frequently included measures of effort when conducting a neuropsychological evaluation. While a majority of respondents (52%) rarely or never provide a warning that effort indicators will be administered, 27% of respondents often or always provide such a warning. The five most frequently used measures of effort or response bias were the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), MMPI-2 F–K ratio, MMPI-2 FBS, Rey 15-item test, and the California Verbal Learning Test. However, the TOMM, Validity Indicator Profile, Word Memory Test, Victoria Symptom Validity Test, and the Computerized Assessment of Response Bias were rated as most accurate for detecting suboptimal effort. These results and other findings are presented and discussed.
Keywords
Malingering , Effort , Survey , Neuropsychology
Journal title
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Record number
516854
Link To Document