Title of article :
Electron-paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using N-methyl-image-glucamine dithiocarbamate iron cannot discriminate between nitric oxide and nitroxyl: implications for the detection of reaction products for nitric oxide synthase
Author/Authors :
Andrei M. Komarov، نويسنده , , David A. Wink، نويسنده , , Martin Feelisch، نويسنده , , Harald H. H. W. Schmidt، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Abstract :
Purified neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS) does not produce nitric oxide (NO) unless high concentrations of superoxide dismutase (SOD) are added, suggesting that nitroxyl (NO−) or a related molecule is the principal reaction product of NOS, which is SOD-dependently converted to NO. This hypothesis was questioned by experiments using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and iron N-methyl-image-glucamine dithiocarbamate (Fe-MGD) as a trap for NO. Although NOS and the NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine produced an electron paramagnetic resonance signal, the NO− donor, Angeli’s salt (AS) did not. AS is a labile compound that rapidly hydrolyzes to nitrite, and important positive control experiments showing that AS was intact were lacking. On reinvestigating this crucial experiment, we find identical MGD2-Fe-NO complexes both from S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine and AS but not from nitrite. Moreover, the yield of MGD2-Fe-NO complex from AS was stoichiometric even in the absence of SOD. Thus, MGD2-Fe directly detects NO−, and any conclusions drawn from MGD2-Fe-NO complexes with respect to the nature of the primary NOS product (NO, NO−, or a related N-oxide) are invalid. Thus, NOS may form NO− or related N-oxides instead of NO.
Keywords :
Nitric oxide , EPR , nitric oxide synthase , superoxide dismutase , free radical , Nitroxyl
Journal title :
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Journal title :
Free Radical Biology and Medicine