Multivariate associates of QT dispersion in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Primacy of patency status of the infarct-related artery, ,

Background: QT dispersion (QTd; QT interval maximum minus minimum) has been shown to reflect regional variations in ventricular repolarization and is increased in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: To determine correlates of QTd in patients who had had myocardial infarction (MI), 207 patients (158 men, aged 57 ± 11 years) with acute MI who were treated with alteplase or anistreplase within 2.7 ± 0.9 hours of symptom onset were studied. Angiograms at a median of 27 hours after thrombolysis showed reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade ≥2) in 184 (88%) patients. QT was measured in 10 ± 2 leads on discharge electrocardiograms with a computerized analysis program interfaced with a digitizer. Associations of QTd with 24 variables related to patient characteristics, acute MI, angiography, interventions, and radionuclide ventriculography were evaluated by univariate and multivariate regression. Results: Univariate associations with QTd (p ≤ 0.10) were Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0/1 versus 2/3 (QTd = 75 ± 33 msec vs 53 ± 22 msec, p < 0.0001), minimal luminal diameter (p = 0.007), left ventricular ejection fraction at discharge (p = 0.007), reinfarction (p = 0.01), number of leads with ST elevation (p = 0.05), end-systolic volume at discharge (p = 0.04), time to peak creatine kinase (p = 0.06), and YST elevation (p = 0.10). Independent associates of QTd were Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 0/1 versus 2/3 (p < 0.0001), reinfarction (p = 0.005), and ejection fraction (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Successful thrombolysis is associated with less QTd in patients after acute MI. Our results support the hypothesis that QTd after MI depends on reperfusion status, reinfarction, and left ventricular function. Reduction in QTd may be an additional mechanism by which the benefit of thrombolytic therapy is realized. (Am Heart J 1998;135:1027-35.)