• Title of article

    Strategy for optimal aortic regurgitation quantification by Doppler echocardiography: Agreement among different methods

  • Author/Authors

    Artur Ebangelista، نويسنده , , Herminio Garcia-del-Castillo، نويسنده , , José Francisco Calvo S، نويسنده , , Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda، نويسنده , , Carles Brotons، نويسنده , , Juan Angel Lafuente، نويسنده , , Teresa Gonz?lez-Alujas، نويسنده , , Pilar Tornos، نويسنده , , Jordi Soler-Soler، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    773
  • To page
    781
  • Abstract
    Background Although different Doppler methods have been validated for aortic regurgitation quantification, the benefit of combining information from different methods has not been defined. Methods Our study included 2 phases. In the initial phase (60 patients), Doppler parameters (jet width, short-axis jet area, apical jet area, regurgitant fraction from pulmonary and mitral flow, and deceleration slope) were correlated with angiography; range values for each severity grade were defined and intraobserver and interobserver and intermachine variability were studied. In the validation phase (158 patients), defined value ranges were prospectively tested and a strategy based on considering as the definitive severity grade that in which the two best methods agreed was tested. Results Jet width has the best correlation with angiography (r = 0.91), and its ratio with the left ventricular outflow diameter did not improve the correlation (r = 0.85) and decreased reproducibility. Apical jet area and regurgitant fraction from pulmonary flow permitted acceptable quantification (r = 0.87 and 0.86, respectively) but with worse reproducibility. The other methods were not assessable in 20% to 30% of studies. Concordance with angiography decreased in jet width when the jet was eccentric (90% vs 77%, P < .01), in apical jet area when mitral valve disease was present (84% vs 65%, P < .02), and in short-axis jet area and regurgitant fraction from pulmonary flow with concomitant aortic stenosis (77% vs 44%, P < .002 and 77% vs 53%, P < .02, respectively). Agreement with angiography was very high (94[95%] of 99) when severity grade coincided in both jet width and apical jet area. In 59 cases without concordance, regurgitant fraction from pulmonary flow was used as a third method. Overall, this strategy permitted concordance with angiography in 146 patients (92%). Conclusions Jet width is the best predictor in aortic regurgitation quantification by Doppler echocardiography. However, better results were obtained when a strategy based on concordance between jet width and another Doppler method was established, particularly when the jet was eccentric.
  • Journal title
    American Heart Journal
  • Serial Year
    2000
  • Journal title
    American Heart Journal
  • Record number

    532088