Revascularization improves survival in ischemic cardiomyopathy regardless of electrocardiographic criteria for prior small-to-medium myocardial infarcts

Background The purpose of the current study was to determine whether survival after revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) is influenced by the extent of electrocardiographic (ECG) evidence of previous myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy by use of the 50-criteria, 31-point Selvester QRS scoring system. Methods Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy documented by a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30% undergoing coronary angiography between January 1984 and July 1996, with no acute MI within the last 30 days, follow-up through 1996, and ≥75% occlusion in at least 1 major coronary artery at catheterization were included. These patients were subdivided on the basis of subsequent treatment: revascularization or no revascularization. The complete Selvester QRS system was applied to each patientʹs ECG and the subgroups were further subdivided by QRS score. Results The 141 patients receiving revascularization had better survival at 5 years compared with the 298 patients receiving no revascularization (adjusted 5-year survival rate 73% vs 47%, P = .0001). No significant treatment differences were observed for low (≤3 points) versus high (>3 points) QRS levels in either of the 2 treatment groups (revascularized patients: P = .215, patients without revascularization: P = .126) between the 2 treatment groups. Although all patients had LVEF ≤30%, only 8% of patients had QRS scores >10 points, the level that would be expected if the decrease in LVEF could be attributed entirely to infarcted myocardium. Conclusions Hibernating myocardium may contribute significantly to the decreased function in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, and the QRS score cannot be used as an independent predictor of survival in those patients with a marked decrease in LVEF but small to moderate infarct sizes. (Am Heart J 2002;143:111-7.)