Resuscitation Medicine Research: Quo Vadis, ,

Laboratory research should have clinical relevance. Topics should be selected according to need, gaps in knowledge, and opportunities; the investigatorʹs background, expertise, interests, and ambitions; scientific, clinical, and socioeconomic importance; and feasibility of successful performance and conclusion. The current explosion of knowledge and sophistication of methods will require research by multidisciplinary teams. Systematic goal-oriented studies should be conducted in environments that encourage serendipitous discoveries. Mechanism- and outcome-oriented research, in laboratories and on patients, is needed. In cardiac arrest research, hearts and brains "too good to die" offer many challenges. In trauma research, particular challenges include protection-preservation during uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, suspended animation for delayed resuscitation in exsanguination, and prevention of brain swelling after traumatic brain injury. Emergency physicians have the unique opportunity to initiate clinical resuscitation research in unexplored territory: the prehospital arena. [Safar P: Resuscitation medicine research: Quo vadis. Ann Emerg Med May 1996;27:542-552.]