Title of article :
Survival Outcomes With the Introduction of Intravenous Epinephrine in the Management of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Author/Authors :
Marcus Eng Hock Ong، نويسنده , , Eng Hoe Tan، نويسنده , , Faith Suan Peng Ng، نويسنده , , Anushia Panchalingham، نويسنده , , Swee Han Lim، نويسنده , , Peter George Manning، نويسنده , , Victor Yeok Kein Ong، نويسنده , , Steven Hoon Chin Lim، نويسنده , , Susan Yap، نويسنده , , Lai Peng Tham، نويسنده , , Kheng Siang Ng، نويسنده , , Anantharaman Venkataraman and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Epidemiology Study Group، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages :
8
From page :
635
To page :
642
Abstract :
Study objective The benefit of epinephrine in cardiac arrest is controversial and has not been conclusively shown in any human clinical study. We seek to assess the effect of introducing intravenous epinephrine on the survival outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in an emergency medical services (EMS) system that previously did not use intravenous medications. Methods This observational, prospective, before-after clinical study constitutes phase II of the Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Epidemiology project. Included were all patients who are older than 8 years, with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest conveyed by the national emergency ambulance service. The comparison between the 2 intervention groups for survival to discharge was made with logistic regression and expressed in terms of the odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results From October 1, 2002, to October 14, 2004, 1,296 patients were enrolled into the study, with 615 in the pre-epinephrine and 681 in the epinephrine phase. Demographic and EMS characteristics were similar in both groups. Forty-four percent of patients received intravenous epinephrine in the epinephrine phase. There was no significant difference in survival to discharge (pre-epinephrine 1.0%; epinephrine 1.6%; OR 1.7 [95% CI 0.6 to 4.5]; adjusted for rhythm OR 2.0 [95% CI 0.7 to 5.5]); return of circulation (pre-epinephrine 17.9%; epinephrine 15.7%; OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.6 to 1.2]), or survival to admission (pre-epinephrine 7.5%; epinephrine 7.5%; OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.7 to 1.5]). There was a minimal increase in scene time in the epinephrine phase (10.3 minutes versus 10.7 minutes; 95% CI of difference 0.02 to 0.94 minutes). Conclusion We were unable to establish a significant survival benefit with the introduction of intravenous epinephrine to an EMS system. More research is needed to determine the effectiveness of drugs such as epinephrine in resuscitation.
Journal title :
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Serial Year :
2007
Journal title :
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Record number :
539141
Link To Document :
بازگشت