Author/Authors :
Nicholas A. Beresford، نويسنده , , Mikhail Balonov، نويسنده , , Karine Beaugelin-Seiller، نويسنده , , Justin Brown، نويسنده , , David Copplestone، نويسنده , , Joanne L. Hingston، نويسنده , , Jan Horyna، نويسنده , , Ali Hosseini، نويسنده , , Brenda J. Howard، نويسنده , , Sunita Kamboj، نويسنده , , Tatjana Nedveckaite، نويسنده , , Geert Olyslaegers، نويسنده , , Tatiana Sazykina، نويسنده , , Jordi Vives i Batlle، نويسنده , , Tamara L. Yankovich، نويسنده , , Charley Yu، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Over the last decade a number of models and approaches have been developed for the estimation of the exposure of non-human biota to ionising radiations. In some countries these are now being used in regulatory assessments. However, to date there has been no attempt to compare the outputs of the different models used. This paper presents the work of the International Atomic Energy Agencyʹs EMRAS Biota Working Group which compares the predictions of a number of such models in model–model and model–data inter-comparisons.
