Title of article :
Influence of psychological response on survival in breast cancer: a population-based cohort study Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
M Watson، نويسنده , , JS Haviland، نويسنده , , S Greer، نويسنده , , J Davidson، نويسنده , , JM Bliss، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Abstract :
Background
The psychological response to breast cancer, such as a fighting spirit or an attitude of helplessness and hopelessness toward the disease, has been suggested as a prognostic factor with an influence on survival. We have investigated the effect of psychological response on disease outcome in a large cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer.
Methods
578 women with early-stage breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective survival study. Psychological response was measured by the mental adjustment to cancer (MAC) scale, the Courtauld emotional control (CEC) scale, and the hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) scale 4–12 weeks and 12 months after diagnosis. The women were followed up for at least 5 years. Coxʹs proportional-hazards regression was used to obtain the hazard ratios for the measures of psychological response, with adjustment for known clinical factors associated with survival.
Finding
At 5 years, 395 women were alive and without relapse, 50 were alive with relapse, and 133 had died. There was a significantly increased risk of death from all causes by 5 years in women with a high score on the HAD scale category of depression (hazard ratio 3·59 [95% CI 1·39–9·24]). There was a significantly increased risk of relapse or death at 5 years in women with high scores on the helplessness and hopelessness category of the MAC scale compared with those with a low score in this category (1·55 [1·07–2·25]). There were no significant results found for the category of “fighting spirit”.
Interpretation
For 5-year event-free survival a high helplessness/hopelessness score has a moderate but detrimental effect. A high score for depression is linked to a significantly reduced chance of survival; however, this result is based on a small number of patients and should be interpreted with caution.
Journal title :
The Lancet
Journal title :
The Lancet