Title of article :
Effect of population screening and treatment for Helicobacter pylori on dyspepsia and quality of life in the community: a randomised controlled trial Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Paul Moayyedi، نويسنده , , Richard Feltbower، نويسنده , , Julia Brown، نويسنده , , Su Mason، نويسنده , , James Mason، نويسنده , , Jackie Nathan، نويسنده , , ID Gerald Richards، نويسنده , , Anthony C Dowell، نويسنده , , Anthony TR Axon and for the Leeds HELP Study، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Pages :
5
From page :
1665
To page :
1669
Abstract :
Background Infection with Helicobacter pylori is the main cause of peptic-ulcer disease. Treatment of this infection might lower the prevalence of dyspepsia in the community and improve quality of life. We investigated this possibility in a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Methods Individuals aged 40–49 years were randomly selected from the lists of 36 primary-care centres. A researcher interviewed participants with a validated dyspepsia questionnaire and the psychological general wellbeing index (PGWB). H pylori status was assessed by the carbon-13-labelled urea breath test. Infected participants were randomly assigned active treatment (omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg, and tinidazole 500 mg, each twice daily for 7 days) or identical placebo. Participants were followed up at 6 months and 2 years. Findings Of 32 929 individuals invited, 8455 attended and were eligible; 2324 were positive for H pylori and were assigned active treatment (1161) or placebo (1163). 1773 (76%) returned at 2 years. Dyspepsia or symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux were reported in 247 (28%) of 880 in the treatment group and 291 (33%) of 871 in the placebo group (absolute-risk reduction 5% [95% CI 1–10]). H pylori treatment had no significant effect on quality of life (mean difference in PGWB score between groups 0·86 [−0·33 to 2·05]). Interpretation Community screening and treatment for H pylori produced only a 5% reduction in dyspepsia. This small benefit had no impact on quality of life.
Journal title :
The Lancet
Serial Year :
2000
Journal title :
The Lancet
Record number :
551847
Link To Document :
بازگشت