Title of article :
Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial
Author/Authors :
KAA Fox، نويسنده , , P.A. Poole-Wilson، نويسنده , , RA Henderson، نويسنده , , TC Clayton، نويسنده , , DA Chamberlain، نويسنده , , TRD Shaw، نويسنده , , D.J. Wheatley، نويسنده , , SJ Pocock and for the Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina (RITA) investigators، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages :
9
From page :
743
To page :
751
Abstract :
Background Current guidelines suggest that, for patients at moderate risk of death from unstable coronary-artery disease, either an interventional strategy (angiography followed by revascularisation) or a conservative strategy (ischaemia-driven or symptom-driven angiography) is appropriate. We aimed to test the hypothesis that an interventional strategy is better than a conservative strategy in such patients. Methods We did a randomised multicentre trial of 1810 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (mean age 62 years, 38% women). Patients were assigned an early intervention or conservative strategy. The antithrombin agent in both groups was enoxaparin. The coprimary endpoints were a combined rate of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or refractory angina at 4 months; and a combined rate of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction at 1 year. Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings At 4 months, 86 (9•6%) of 895 patients in the intervention group had died or had a myocardial infarction or refractory angina, compared with 133 (14•5%) of 915 patients in the conservative group (risk ratio 0•66, 95% CI 0•51–0•85, p=0•001). This difference was mainly due to a halving of refractory angina in the intervention group. Death or myocardial infarction was similar in both treatment groups at 1 year (68 [7•6%] vs 76 [8•3%], respectively; risk ratio 0•91, 95% CI 0•67–1•25, p=0•58). Symptoms of angina were improved and use of antianginal medications significantly reduced with the interventional strategy (p<0•0001). Interpretation In patients presenting with unstable coronaryartery disease, an interventional strategy is preferable to a conservative strategy, mainly because of the halving of refractory or severe angina, and with no increased risk of death or myocardial infarction. Published online September 1, 2002. http://image.thelancet.com/extras/02art8090web.pdf
Journal title :
The Lancet
Serial Year :
2002
Journal title :
The Lancet
Record number :
557307
Link To Document :
بازگشت