• Title of article

    RETRACTED: Combination treatment of angiotensin-II receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in non-diabetic renal disease (COOPERATE): a randomised controlled trial

  • Author/Authors

    Naoyuki Nakao، نويسنده , , Ashio Yoshimura، نويسنده , , Hiroyuki Morita، نويسنده , , Masyuki Takada، نويسنده , , Tsuguo Kayano، نويسنده , , Terukuni Ideura، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    117
  • To page
    124
  • Abstract
    Background Present angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor treatment fails to prevent progression of non-diabetic renal disease. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combined treatment of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin-II receptor blocker, and monotherapy of each drug at its maximumdose, in patients with non-diabetic renal disease. Methods 336 patients with non-diabetic renal disease were enrolled from one renal outpatient department in Japan. After screening and an 18-week run-in period, 263 patients were randomly assigned angiotensin-II receptor blocker (losartan, 100 mg daily), angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (trandolapril, 3 mg daily), or a combination of both drugs at equivalent doses. Survival analysis was done to compare the effects of each regimen on the combined primary endpoint of time to doubling of serum creatinine concentration or end-stage renal disease. Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings Seven patients discontinued or were otherwise lost to follow-up. Ten (11%) of 85 patients on combination treatment reached the combined primary endpoint compared with 20 (23%) of 85 on trandolapril alone (hazard ratio 0•38, 95% CI 0•18–0•63, p=0•018) and 20 (23%) of 86 on losartan alone (0•40, 0•17–0•69, p=0•016). Covariates affecting renal survival were combination treatment (hazard ratio 0•38, 95% CI 0•18–0•63, p=0•011), age (1•30, 1•03–2•29, p=0•009), baseline renal function (1•80, 1•02–2•99, p=0•021), change in daily urinary protein excretion rate (0•58, 0•24–0•88, p=0•022), use of diuretics (0•80, 0•30–0•94, p=0•043), and antiproteinuric response to trandolapril (0•81, 0•21–0•91, p=0•039). Frequency of side-effects with combination treatment was the same as with trandolapril alone. Interpretation Combination treatment safely retards progression of non-diabetic renal disease compared with monotherapy. However, since some patients reached the combined primary endpoint on combined treatment, further strategies for complete management of progressive nondiabetic renal disease need to be researched.
  • Journal title
    The Lancet
  • Serial Year
    2003
  • Journal title
    The Lancet
  • Record number

    558237