Title of article :
On becoming neutral: effects of experimental neutralizing reconsidered
Author/Authors :
Marcel van den Hout، نويسنده , , Maureen van Pol، نويسنده , , Madelon Peters، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Pages :
10
From page :
1439
To page :
1448
Abstract :
Behaviour Research and Therapy 34 (1996) 889–898 found that writing out a negative thought produced anxiety and an urge to neutralize the thought, that instructing participants to neutralize the thought reduced anxiety/neutralization urge in the short run (i.e. within 2 min), but that in the control group 20 min without instruction was attended by the same reduction in anxiety/urge to neutralize (“natural decay”). The observations were made with pariticipants who scored high on “thought action fusion” and the experiment was set up as exerimental model of obsessions. We repeated the study with participants that were not selected on thought action fusion. All the findings reported by Behaviour Research and Therapy 34 (1996) 889–898 were replicated. Correlational analysis indicated that the strength of the effect was not related to scores on scales measuring “thought action fusion”. Behaviour Research and Therapy 34 (1996) 889–898 did not assess whether non-neutralizing was followed by immediate reductions in distress. We did assess this and found that the larger part of the immediate reduction of distress after neutralization also occurs when no neutralization instruction is given. The effects of neutralization instructions in the present type of experiment are considerably less powerful than suggested earlier.
Keywords :
Obsessions , Neutralisation , Thought action fusion
Journal title :
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Serial Year :
2001
Journal title :
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Record number :
569447
Link To Document :
بازگشت