Title of article :
Postoperative exercise tolerance after aortic valve replacement by small-size prosthesis : Functional consequence of small-size aortic prosthesis
Author/Authors :
Pierre Becassis، نويسنده , , Maurice Hayot، نويسنده , , Jean-Marc Frapier، نويسنده , , Florence Leclercq، نويسنده , , Lionel Beck، نويسنده , , Jérome Brunet، نويسنده , , Eric Arnaud، نويسنده , , Christian Prefaut، نويسنده , , Paul-André. Chaptal، نويسنده , , J. M. Davy، نويسنده , , Patrick Messner-Pellenc، نويسنده , , R. Grolleau، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Abstract :
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this study was to determine whether a small-size valve prosthesis contributes to exercise intolerance, as assessed by V 2 measurement during an exhaustive cycle ergometer exercise.
BACKGROUND
The determinants of exercise capacity after mechanical aortic replacement are not well known. The selection of small valve sizes has, however, been described as an independent predictor of exercise intolerance as assessed by exercise duration. Maximal oxygen uptake (V 2 max) is a good index of exercise tolerance.
METHODS
Fourteen patients were eligible, with a mean age of 62 ± 6 years. Before surgery, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 73 ± 8%. Two valve types with small diameter (19 to 21 mm) were used: Medtronic Hall and St Jude Medical. A healthy sedentary control group (n = 14) paired for age, weight and size was constituted. After one year of follow-up, cardiorespiratory tests were performed. In addition, the gradients through the prostheses were determined by continuous pulse Doppler at rest and immediately after the cardiorespiratory test.
RESULTS
The exercise tolerance was not significantly different between the control group and patient group: V 2 peak (21.7 vs. 20.4 ml/kg/min; p = 0.42), workloads (115 vs. 93 W; p = 0.13) and ventilatory parameters were similar. The mean and peak gradients at rest and during exercise were not correlated with V 2max.
CONCLUSIONS
Valve replacement by small aortic prosthesis does not seem to be a factor of exercise intolerance as assessed by V 2 max in patients without LVEF dysfunction before surgery.
Keywords :
Medtronic Hall , ventilatory threshold , respiratory gas exchange ratio (VO 2/VO 2) , maximal workload , R , Wmax , SJM , St Jude Medical , VEmax , Vital capacity , minute ventilation at peak exercise , FEV1 , VO 2max , forced expiratory volume in 1 s , maximal oxygen uptake , HR , VO 2 peak , heart rate , peak oxygen consumption , LVEF , VR , left ventricular ejection fraction , ventilatory reserve , MH , VT , VC
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)