Title of article :
Outcome of patients with congestive heart failure treated with standard versus high doses of enalapril: a multicenter study
Author/Authors :
John N. Nanas، نويسنده , , George Alexopoulos، نويسنده , , Maria I. Anastasiou-Nana، نويسنده , , Konstantinos Karidis، نويسنده , , Argiris Tirologos، نويسنده , , Spyridon Zobolos، نويسنده , , Vlasios Pirgakis، نويسنده , , Labros Anthopoulos، نويسنده , , Dimitrios Sideris، نويسنده , , Stamatis F. Stamatelopoulos، نويسنده , , Spyridon D. Moulopoulos، نويسنده , , for the High Enalapril D، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Abstract :
OBJECTIVES
We sought to prospectively and randomly compare survival with clinical and hemodynamic variables in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) treated with standard versus high doses of enalapril.
BACKGROUND
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors produce hemodynamic and symptomatic benefits in patients with CHF, but there is still controversy about the optimal dose in this clinical setting.
METHODS
Two hundred and forty-eight patients with advanced CHF (age 56.3 ± 12 years) were randomized to receive a maximal tolerated dose of enalapril, up to 20 mg/day in group 1 (mean dose achieved 17.9 ± 4.3 mg/day, N = 122) and 60 mg/day in group 2 (mean dose achieved 42 ± 19.3 mg/day, N = 126).
RESULTS
At enrollment, patients in group 1 were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2.6 ± 0.7 and had a mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 117 ± 18 mm Hg, a mean heart rate (HR) of 85 ± 16 beats/min and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20.0 ± 9.8%. In group 2, patients were in NYHA class 2.6 ± 0.7; their SBP was 118 ± 17 mm Hg, HR 83 ± 15 beats/min and LVEF 18.8 ± 8.1%. There were no significant differences in these characteristics between the two groups of patients at enrollment. After 12 months of follow-up, 22 (18%) of 122 patients in group 1 and 23 (18%) of 126 patients in group 2 had died (p = 0.995, with 80% power of the study to detect a delta difference of 13%). The NYHA class was the same (1.9 ± 0.7) in both groups; SBP was 111 ± 16 and 111 ± 17 mm Hg, HR 77 ± 12 and 79 ± 13 beats/min and LVEF 31 ± 19% and 30 ± 12% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. The study had a power of 80% to detect (p = 0.05) the following changes: 13% in death rate, 0.25 units in NYHA class, 6 mm Hg in SBP, 5 beats/min in HR and 6% in LVEF.
CONCLUSIONS
No significant differences were found in survival and clinical and hemodynamic variables between patients receiving standard and those receiving high doses of enalapril.
Keywords :
LVEF , left ventricular ejection fraction , NYHA , SBP , systolic blood pressure , New York Heart Association , ACE , SOLVD , Atlas , V-HeFT , Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril And Survival study , Veterans Administration Vasodilator Heart Failure Trial , angiotensin-converting enzyme , Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction , CHF , Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study , Consensus , Congestive heart failure , heart rate , HR
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)