• Title of article

    Development of a risk adjustment mortality model using the American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC–NCDR) experience: 1998–2000

  • Author/Authors

    Richard E. Shaw، نويسنده , , H. Vernon Anderson، نويسنده , , Ralph G. Brindis، نويسنده , , Ronald J. Krone MD، نويسنده , , Lloyd W. Klein، نويسنده , , Charles R. McKay، نويسنده , , Peter C. Block، نويسنده , , Leslee J. Shaw، نويسنده , , Kathleen Hewitt، نويسنده , , William S. Weintraub، نويسنده , , ACC-NCDR، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    1104
  • To page
    1112
  • Abstract
    Objectives We sought to develop and evaluate a risk adjustment model for in-hospital mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures using data from a large, multi-center registry. Background The 1998–2000 American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC–NCDR) dataset was used to overcome limitations of prior risk-adjustment analyses. Methods Data on 100,253 PCI procedures collected at the ACC–NCDR between January 1, 1998, and September 30, 2000, were analyzed. A training set/test set approach was used. Separate models were developed for presentation with and without acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 24 h. Results Factors associated with increased risk of PCI mortality (with odds ratios in parentheses) included cardiogenic shock (8.49), increasing age (2.61 to 11.25), salvage (13.38) urgent (1.78) or emergent PCI (5.75), pre-procedure intra-aortic balloon pump insertion (1.68), decreasing left ventricular ejection fraction (0.87 to 3.93), presentation with acute MI (1.31), diabetes (1.41), renal failure (3.04), chronic lung disease (1.33); treatment approaches including thrombolytic therapy (1.39) and non-stent devices (1.64); and lesion characteristics including left main (2.04), proximal left anterior descending disease (1.97) and Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions lesion classification (1.64 to 2.11). Overall, excellent discrimination was achieved (C-index = 0.89) and application of the model to high-risk patient groups demonstrated C-indexes exceeding 0.80. Patient factors were more predictive in the MI model, while lesion and procedural factors were more predictive in the analysis of non-MI patients. Conclusions A risk adjustment model for in-hospital mortality after PCI was successfully developed using a contemporary multi-center registry. This model is an important tool for valid comparison of in-hospital mortality after PCI.
  • Keywords
    MI , OR , odds ratio , myocardial infarction , CI , SCAI LC , Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , Receiver operating characteristic , CABG , ROC , IABP , Confidence interval , Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Lesion Classification , LAD , left anterior descending , left ventricular ejection fraction , intra-aortic balloon pump , American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry , Percutaneous coronary intervention , ACC–NCDR , PCI , LVEF
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Serial Year
    2002
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Record number

    597195