• Title of article

    The effect of intracoronary radiation for the treatment of recurrent in-stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus

  • Author/Authors

    Luis Gruberg، نويسنده , , Ron Waksman، نويسنده , , Andrew E. Ajani، نويسنده , , Han-Soo Kim، نويسنده , , R.Lawrence White†، نويسنده , , Ellen E. Pinnow، نويسنده , , Lowell F Satler*، نويسنده , , Augusto D Pichard*، نويسنده , , Kenneth M Kent*، نويسنده , , Joseph Lindsay Jr، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    1930
  • To page
    1936
  • Abstract
    Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) in diabetic patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). Background Diabetic patients are at an increased risk for restenosis, repeat revascularization procedures and late mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions and stenting. Intracoronary radiation therapy, utilizing both gamma and beta-emitters, has been shown to reduce the rate of ISR. Methods The study group consisted of 749 consecutive patients with ISR who were treated with either IRT or placebo in randomized trials and registries at our center. Diabetic patients (252 radiation and 51 placebo) were compared with nondiabetic patients (371 radiation and 75 placebo). Results In-hospital outcomes were similar between diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated with and without radiation. At six-month clinical and angiographic follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the binary restenosis (63.8% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.0001), target lesion revascularization (66.7% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.0001) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (70.6% vs. 22.9%, p < 0.0001) rates in diabetic patients treated with radiation compared to placebo. Comparisons between the placebo arms detected a trend towards higher restenosis (63.8% vs. 48.4% p = 0.13) and TVR (70.6% vs. 56.0%, p = 0.14) in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients. In contrast, diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated with IRT experienced similar restenosis (15.6% vs. 10.7% p = 0.33) and TVR (22.9% vs. 28.2% p = 0.41) rates. Conclusions In diabetic patients with ISR, intracoronary radiation significantly reduced the recurrence of ISR compared to placebo. Additionally, similar rates of restenosis and revascularization procedures were achieved in irradiated diabetic and nondiabetic patients. In view of these results, IRT should be considered as a valuable therapeutic alternative in all diabetic patients with ISR.
  • Keywords
    In-stent restenosis , NITDM , noninsulin-treated diabetes mellitus , CABG , TLR , CI , TVR , Confidence interval , target vessel revascularization , Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , target lesion revascularization , DM , Wrist , percutaneous coronary interventions , diabetes mellitus , Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial , ITDM , IRT , ISR , insulin-treated diabetes mellitus , PCI , intracoronary radiation therapy
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Serial Year
    2002
  • Journal title
    JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
  • Record number

    597335