• Title of article

    Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: An Australian survey of health issues

  • Author/Authors

    Erik Nord، نويسنده , , Jeff Richardson، نويسنده , , Andrew Street، نويسنده , , Helga Kuhse، نويسنده , , Peter Singer، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1995
  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    1429
  • To page
    1437
  • Abstract
    Economists have often treated the objective of health services as being the maximization of the QALYs gained, irrespective of how the gains are distributed. In a cross section of Australians such a policy of distributive neutrality received: (a) very little support when health benefits to young people compete with health benefits to the elderly; (b) only moderate support when those who can become a little better compete with those who can become much better; (c) only moderate support when smokers compete with non smokers; (d) some support when young children compete with newborns; and (e) wide spread support when parents of dependent children compete with people without children. Overall, the views of the study population were strongly egalitarian. A policy of health benefit maximization received very limited support when the consequence is a loss of equity and access to services for the elderly and for people with a limited potential for improving their health.
  • Keywords
    QALY , Priority , Health economics , egalitarian , Equity
  • Journal title
    Social Science and Medicine
  • Serial Year
    1995
  • Journal title
    Social Science and Medicine
  • Record number

    598792