Title of article
Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: An Australian survey of health issues
Author/Authors
Erik Nord، نويسنده , , Jeff Richardson، نويسنده , , Andrew Street، نويسنده , , Helga Kuhse، نويسنده , , Peter Singer، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1995
Pages
9
From page
1429
To page
1437
Abstract
Economists have often treated the objective of health services as being the maximization of the QALYs gained, irrespective of how the gains are distributed. In a cross section of Australians such a policy of distributive neutrality received: (a) very little support when health benefits to young people compete with health benefits to the elderly; (b) only moderate support when those who can become a little better compete with those who can become much better; (c) only moderate support when smokers compete with non smokers; (d) some support when young children compete with newborns; and (e) wide spread support when parents of dependent children compete with people without children. Overall, the views of the study population were strongly egalitarian. A policy of health benefit maximization received very limited support when the consequence is a loss of equity and access to services for the elderly and for people with a limited potential for improving their health.
Keywords
QALY , Priority , Health economics , egalitarian , Equity
Journal title
Social Science and Medicine
Serial Year
1995
Journal title
Social Science and Medicine
Record number
598792
Link To Document