Title of article :
Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: An Australian survey of health issues
Author/Authors :
Erik Nord، نويسنده , , Jeff Richardson، نويسنده , , Andrew Street، نويسنده , , Helga Kuhse، نويسنده , , Peter Singer، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1995
Pages :
9
From page :
1429
To page :
1437
Abstract :
Economists have often treated the objective of health services as being the maximization of the QALYs gained, irrespective of how the gains are distributed. In a cross section of Australians such a policy of distributive neutrality received: (a) very little support when health benefits to young people compete with health benefits to the elderly; (b) only moderate support when those who can become a little better compete with those who can become much better; (c) only moderate support when smokers compete with non smokers; (d) some support when young children compete with newborns; and (e) wide spread support when parents of dependent children compete with people without children. Overall, the views of the study population were strongly egalitarian. A policy of health benefit maximization received very limited support when the consequence is a loss of equity and access to services for the elderly and for people with a limited potential for improving their health.
Keywords :
QALY , Priority , Health economics , egalitarian , Equity
Journal title :
Social Science and Medicine
Serial Year :
1995
Journal title :
Social Science and Medicine
Record number :
598792
Link To Document :
بازگشت