• Title of article

    This paper employs qualitative methods to explore the ramifications of a police drug crackdown on drug injectors’ ability to practice harm reduction. Between August and December 2000, we conducted open-ended interviews with 40 illicit-drug-injecting resid

  • Author/Authors

    Peter Bower>، نويسنده , , Michael King، نويسنده , , Irwin Nazareth، نويسنده , , Fiona Lampe، نويسنده , , Bonnie Sibbald، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
  • Pages
    11
  • From page
    685
  • To page
    695
  • Abstract
    Patient preferences have recently been highlighted as a potential threat to the validity of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although there have been significant methodological and statistical developments in relation to these issues, comparatively little attention has been paid to the development of a conceptual model concerning preferences and their effects on decision-making. This article describes the development of such a model, which was undertaken in parallel with a systematic review of the empirical data concerning preference effects. The model describes the concept of preference in terms of theoretical concepts from the psychological and economics literature, and describes a preliminary model of the development and operation of preferences in the context of RCTs. The paper then examines the implications of the model for informed consent and recruitment procedures. Key issues for future research are also outlined.
  • Keywords
    randomised controlled trials , Preference trials , methodology , Informed consent
  • Journal title
    Social Science and Medicine
  • Serial Year
    2005
  • Journal title
    Social Science and Medicine
  • Record number

    602446