Title of article
This paper employs qualitative methods to explore the ramifications of a police drug crackdown on drug injectors’ ability to practice harm reduction. Between August and December 2000, we conducted open-ended interviews with 40 illicit-drug-injecting resid
Author/Authors
Peter Bower>، نويسنده , , Michael King، نويسنده , , Irwin Nazareth، نويسنده , , Fiona Lampe، نويسنده , , Bonnie Sibbald، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
11
From page
685
To page
695
Abstract
Patient preferences have recently been highlighted as a potential threat to the validity of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although there have been significant methodological and statistical developments in relation to these issues, comparatively little attention has been paid to the development of a conceptual model concerning preferences and their effects on decision-making. This article describes the development of such a model, which was undertaken in parallel with a systematic review of the empirical data concerning preference effects. The model describes the concept of preference in terms of theoretical concepts from the psychological and economics literature, and describes a preliminary model of the development and operation of preferences in the context of RCTs. The paper then examines the implications of the model for informed consent and recruitment procedures. Key issues for future research are also outlined.
Keywords
randomised controlled trials , Preference trials , methodology , Informed consent
Journal title
Social Science and Medicine
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
Social Science and Medicine
Record number
602446
Link To Document