Title of article
Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: A Position Article
Author/Authors
David M. Shahian، نويسنده , , Eugene H. Blackstone، نويسنده , , Fred H. Edwards، نويسنده , , Frederick L. Grover، نويسنده , , Gary L. Grunkemeier، نويسنده , , David C. Naftel، نويسنده , , Samer AM Nashef، نويسنده , , William C. Nugent، نويسنده , , Eric D. Peterson، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
10
From page
1868
To page
1877
Abstract
Differences in medical outcomes may result from disease severity, treatment effectiveness, or chance. Because most outcome studies are observational rather than randomized, risk adjustment is necessary to account for case mix. This has usually been accomplished through the use of standard logistic regression models, although Bayesian models, hierarchical linear models, and machine-learning techniques such as neural networks have also been used. Many factors are essential to insuring the accuracy and usefulness of such models, including selection of an appropriate clinical database, inclusion of critical core variables, precise definitions for predictor variables and endpoints, proper model development, validation, and audit. Risk models may be used to assess the impact of specific predictors on outcome, to aid in patient counseling and treatment selection, to profile provider quality, and to serve as the basis of continuous quality improvement activities.
Journal title
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Record number
608116
Link To Document