Title of article :
Lung Volume Reduction Reoperations
Author/Authors :
Federico Tacconi، نويسنده , , Eugenio Pompeo، نويسنده , , Daniele Forcella، نويسنده , , Mario Marino، نويسنده , , Dimitrios Varvaras، نويسنده , , Tommaso C. Mineo، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Abstract :
Background
Optimal management of emphysematous patients who have lost the benefits achieved after lung volume reduction surgery is a clinical dilemma. We have hypothesized that in stringently selected instances, lung volume reduction reoperations might be considered as a salvage surgical treatment. We sought to analyze the results of a series of patients undergoing lung volume reduction reoperations after successful bilateral lung volume reduction surgery.
Methods
Between January 2000 and April 2006, 17 patients (mean age, 66 ± 3 years) with radiologic evidence of distinct regional lung hyperinflation underwent lung volume reduction reoperations. Surgical procedures entailed completion lobectomy in 7 patients, nonanatomic resection of lung target areas were performed in 5 patients under general anesthesia with one-lung ventilation, and awake lung plication was performed in 5 patients under sole epidural anesthesia. Follow-up at 6 and 12 months was complete in all survivors.
Results
Mean operative time was 100 ± 12 minutes. Two patients (11.7%) died perioperatively of adult respiratory distress syndrome. Hospital stay was 9 ± 2 days. Significant improvements occurred for up to 12 months in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1; p < 0.001), forced vital capacity (p < 0.002), residual volume (p < 0.001), 6-minute walk test (p < 0.001), and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea index (p < 0.001). At 6-months, improvements in FEV1 were greater than 200 mL in 11 patients and correlated with the postoperative reduction in residual volume (r = −0.62, p = 0.01); baseline residual volume was inversely correlated with the degree of improvement in the dyspnea index (r = −0.54, p = 0.03).
Conclusions
Lung volume reduction reoperations can offer significant clinical improvement to stringently selected patients who have lost the clinical benefit achieved after lung volume reduction surgery.
Journal title :
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Journal title :
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery