• Title of article

    Prophylactic Low-Energy Shock Wave Therapy Improves Wound Healing After Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

  • Author/Authors

    Julia Dumfarth، نويسنده , , Daniel Zimpfer، نويسنده , , Margit V?gele-Kadletz، نويسنده , , Johannes Holfeld، نويسنده , , Florian Sihorsch، نويسنده , , Wolfgang Schaden، نويسنده , , Martin Czerny، نويسنده , , Seyedhossein Aharinejad، نويسنده , , Ernst Wolner، نويسنده , , Michael Grimm، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    1909
  • To page
    1913
  • Abstract
    Background Wound healing disorders after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery increase morbidity and lower patient satisfaction. Low-energy shock wave therapy (SWT) reportedly improves healing of diabetic and vascular ulcers by overexpression of vascular endothelial growth fractor and downregulation of necrosis factor κB. In this study, we investigate whether prophylactic low-energy SWT improves wound healing after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Methods One hundred consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned to either prophylactic low-energy SWT (n = 50) or control (n = 50). Low-energy SWT was applied to the site of vein harvesting after wound closure under sterile conditions using a commercially available SWT system (Dermagold; Tissue Regeneration Technologies, Woodstock, GA). A total of 25 impulses (0.1 mJ/mm2; 5 Hz) were applied per centimeter wound length. Wound healing was evaluated and quantified using the ASEPSIS score. (ASEPSIS stands for Additional treatment, presence of Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of the deep tissue, Isolation of bacteria, and duration of inpatient Stay). Patient demographics, operative data, and postoperative adverse events were monitored. Results Patient characteristics and operative data including wound length (SWT 39 ± 13 cm versus control 37 ± 11 cm, p = 0.342) were comparable between the two groups. We observed lower ASEPSIS scores indicating improved wound healing in the SWT group (4.4 ± 5.3) compared with the control group (11.6 ± 8.3, p = 0.0001). Interestingly, we observed a higher incidence of wound healing disorders necessitating antibiotic treatment in the control group (22%) as compared with the SWT group (4%, p = 0.015). No SWT-associated adverse events were observed in the treatment group. Conclusions As shown in this prospective randomized study, prophylactic application of low-energy SWT improves wound healing after vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
  • Journal title
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Serial Year
    2008
  • Journal title
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Record number

    612094