Title of article
Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation?
Author/Authors
Robert J McKenna Jr، نويسنده , , Randall K Wolf، نويسنده , , Matthew Brenner، نويسنده , , Richard J Fischel، نويسنده , , Peter Wurnig، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
Pages
5
From page
1903
To page
1907
Abstract
Background. Although the public perceives video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) as advantageous because it is less invasive than a thoracotomy, the medical community has questioned the safety of VATS lobectomy and its adequacy as a cancer operation. Reported series have not been able to address these issues because follow-up has been only short-term.
Methods. A multiinstitutional, retrospective review was performed in 298 consecutive patients who underwent VATS for a standard anatomic lobectomy with lymph node dissection for lung cancer. Pathologic staging was I in 233 (78%), II in 27 (9%), and IIIA in 38 (13%) patients. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed.
Results. The conversion rate from VATS lobectomy to thoracotomy was 6%, but none were for massive intraoperative bleeding. The only death (0.3%) was because of mesenteric venous thrombosis. Forty minor complications occurred in 38 patients (12.8%) undergoing VATS. The mean and median lengths of stay were 5 ± 3.39 and 4 days, respectively. Recurrence in an incision occurred in 1 patient (0.3%). The Kaplan Meier 4-year survival for stage I was 70% ± 5%.
Conclusion. The VATS lobectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma appears to be a safe operation, with the same survival as expected for a lobectomy done by thoracotomy.
Journal title
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Serial Year
1998
Journal title
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Record number
615557
Link To Document