Author/Authors :
Tadashi Nishimaki، نويسنده , , Otsuo Tanaka، نويسنده , , Nobutoshi Ando، نويسنده , , Hiroko Ide، نويسنده , , Hiroshi Watanabe، نويسنده , , Masayuki Shinoda، نويسنده , , Wataru Takiyama، نويسنده , , Hideaki Yamana، نويسنده , , Kaoru Ishida، نويسنده , , Kaichi Isono، نويسنده , , Mitsuo Endo، نويسنده , , Toshiyuki Ikeuchi، نويسنده , , Toshio Mitomi، نويسنده , , Hiroyoshi Koizumi، نويسنده , , Masayuki Imamura، نويسنده , , Toshifumi Iiz، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background. Exact clinical staging before treatment of esophageal cancer has become increasingly important in the evaluation and comparison of the results of different treatment modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.
Methods. The accuracy of preoperative tumor staging by using an esophagography, esophagoscopy, percutaneous and endoscopic ultrasonography, and computed tomography was assessed in 224 patients with resectable esophageal cancer. The results of tumor staging by these tests were compared prospectively with the pathologic stage of the esophagectomy specimens with respect to the T and N categories defined by the International Union Against Cancer TNM classification.
Results. For the T category, the overall accuracy was 80%. For the N category, overall accuracy was 72%, with a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 60%, and a positive predictive value of 78%. Overall, the accuracy of stage grouping was 56%.
Conclusions. Either the T or N categories can be predicted reliably by clinical staging techniques. However, the preoperative stage grouping might not be valid in resectable, localized esophageal cancer.