Title of article :
Who should follow up lung cancer patients after operation?
Author/Authors :
Sébastien Gilbert، نويسنده , , Kenneth R Reid، نويسنده , , Miu Y Lam، نويسنده , , Dimitri Petsikas، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Pages :
5
From page :
1696
To page :
1700
Abstract :
Background. It is unclear whether follow-up by a thoracic surgeon after lung cancer resection alters survival. Methods. The charts of 245 early stage (≤ IIB) non–small cell lung cancer patients, diagnosed between 1988 and 1995, were reviewed. Follow-up data were complete to January 1, 1997, in 96.3% (236 of 245) of cases. Results. Ninety of the 111 recurrences were detected before discharge from the thoracic clinic. Despite clinic follow-up, 66.7% (60 of 90) were identified by the family physician, and only 28.9% (26 of 90) by the surgeon. The remaining 4.4% (4 of 90) were detected by other physicians. Ninety-six percent (25 of 26) surgeon-detected recurrences had suspicious clinical or chest radiographic findings, compared with 92% for family physician–detected recurrences (55 of 60; not significant). The cost per recurrence detected by surgeons was Can $4,367. A 75% cost savings could ensure if patients were followed up by their family physician. There was no 5-year survival benefit for patients whose recurrence was detected by the surgeon. Conclusions. Long-term follow-up after limited-stage non–small cell lung cancer resection could possibly be performed by a family physician alone without compromising overall survival, and with significant cost savings.
Journal title :
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Serial Year :
2000
Journal title :
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Record number :
616835
Link To Document :
بازگشت